BACKGROUND: Teaching effectiveness is an important criterion for promoting clinician-educators. However, the relationship between residents' psychological characteristics and their assessments of faculty physicians is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether residents' well-being and empathy influenced their assessments of faculty physicians. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We studied 1,191 assessments of 356 faculty physicians by 209 internal medicine residents at a large academic medical center from 2007 to 2008. A repeated measures design with multivariate generalized estimating equations was used to evaluate associations between resident well-being and empathy, and residents' assessments of faculty. MEASUREMENTS: Resident surveys included standardized measures of quality of life, burnout, depression, and empathy. Residents assessed faculty members' teaching performance with a validated 16-item instrument. RESULTS: 149 residents (71%) provided well-being, empathy, and assessment data. In multivariate models, faculty assessments from the previous year were the strongest predictor of current resident-of-faculty assessment scores. Residents' Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE) scores were also associated with faculty assessments (beta = 0.0063, 95% CI = 0.0018-0.0108; p = .0061). On this 140-point, 20-item scale, a 10-point increase in empathy correlated with a 0.063-point increase in residents' assessments of faculty on a 5-point scale. There were no significant associations between residents' assessments of faculty and quality of life, burnout, or depression. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that residents' well-being does not influence their assessments of faculty physicians, thus supporting the trustworthiness of these assessments as a criterion for promoting clinician-educators. However, the association between residents' empathy and resident-of-faculty assessments suggests that faculty assessments may be modestly influenced by residents' intrinsic characteristics.
BACKGROUND: Teaching effectiveness is an important criterion for promoting clinician-educators. However, the relationship between residents' psychological characteristics and their assessments of faculty physicians is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether residents' well-being and empathy influenced their assessments of faculty physicians. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We studied 1,191 assessments of 356 faculty physicians by 209 internal medicine residents at a large academic medical center from 2007 to 2008. A repeated measures design with multivariate generalized estimating equations was used to evaluate associations between resident well-being and empathy, and residents' assessments of faculty. MEASUREMENTS: Resident surveys included standardized measures of quality of life, burnout, depression, and empathy. Residents assessed faculty members' teaching performance with a validated 16-item instrument. RESULTS: 149 residents (71%) provided well-being, empathy, and assessment data. In multivariate models, faculty assessments from the previous year were the strongest predictor of current resident-of-faculty assessment scores. Residents' Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE) scores were also associated with faculty assessments (beta = 0.0063, 95% CI = 0.0018-0.0108; p = .0061). On this 140-point, 20-item scale, a 10-point increase in empathy correlated with a 0.063-point increase in residents' assessments of faculty on a 5-point scale. There were no significant associations between residents' assessments of faculty and quality of life, burnout, or depression. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that residents' well-being does not influence their assessments of faculty physicians, thus supporting the trustworthiness of these assessments as a criterion for promoting clinician-educators. However, the association between residents' empathy and resident-of-faculty assessments suggests that faculty assessments may be modestly influenced by residents' intrinsic characteristics.
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Paul Novotny; Mary E Johnson; Xinghua Zhao; David P Steensma; Martha Q Lacy; Joseph Rubin; Jeff Sloan Journal: Oncology Date: 2005-03-16 Impact factor: 2.935
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Colin West; Xinghua Zhao; Paul Novotny; Joseph Kolars; Thomas Habermann; Jeff Sloan Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: R L Spitzer; J B Williams; K Kroenke; M Linzer; F V deGruy; S R Hahn; D Brody; J G Johnson Journal: JAMA Date: 1994-12-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Staci M Lee; Mark C Lee; Darcy A Reed; Andrew J Halvorsen; Elie F Berbari; Furman S McDonald; Thomas J Beckman Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2014-12
Authors: S S Lenny Lases; Onyebuchi A Arah; E G J M Robert Pierik; Erik Heineman; M J M H Kiki Lombarts Journal: World J Surg Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 3.352