Literature DB >> 15040645

Failure of computerized treatment suggestions to improve health outcomes of outpatients with uncomplicated hypertension: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Michael D Murray1, Lisa E Harris, J Marc Overhage, Xiao-Hua Zhou, George J Eckert, Faye E Smith, Nancy Nienaber Buchanan, Fredric D Wolinsky, Clement J McDonald, William M Tierney.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of evidence-based treatment suggestions for hypertension made to physicians and pharmacists using a comprehensive electronic medical record system.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial with a 2 x 2 factorial design of physician and pharmacist interventions, which resulted in four groups of patients: physician intervention only, pharmacist intervention only, intervention by physician and pharmacist, and intervention by neither physician nor pharmacist (control).
SETTING: Academic primary care internal medicine practice.
SUBJECTS: Seven hundred twelve patients with uncomplicated hypertension.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Suggestions were displayed to physicians on computer workstations used to write outpatient orders and to pharmacists when filling prescriptions. The primary end point was generic health-related quality of life. Secondary end points were symptom profile and side effects from antihypertensive drugs, number of emergency department visits and hospitalizations, blood pressure measurements, patient satisfaction with physicians and pharmacists, drug therapy compliance, and health care charges. In the control group, implementation of care changes in accordance with treatment suggestions was observed in 26% of patients. In the intervention groups, compliance with suggestions was poor, with treatment suggestions implemented in 25% of patients for whom suggestions were displayed only to pharmacists, 29% of those for whom suggestions were displayed only to physicians, and 35% of the group for whom both physicians and pharmacists received suggestions (p=0.13). Intergroup differences were neither statistically significant nor clinically relevant for generic health-related quality of life, symptom and side-effect profiles, number of emergency department visits and hospitalizations, blood pressure measurements, charges, or drug therapy compliance.
CONCLUSION: Computer-based intervention using a sophisticated electronic physician order-entry system failed to improve compliance with treatment suggestions or outcomes of patients with uncomplicated hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15040645     DOI: 10.1592/phco.24.4.324.33173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  55 in total

Review 1.  Changing clinical practice through patient specific reminders available at the time of the clinical encounter: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tim A Holt; Margaret Thorogood; Frances Griffiths
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Using electronic health records to help coordinate care.

Authors:  Lynda C Burton; Gerard F Anderson; Irvin W Kues
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Commentary--improving diabetes care by combating clinical inertia.

Authors:  Patrick J O'Connor
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Informatics systems to promote improved care for chronic illness: a literature review.

Authors:  David Dorr; Laura M Bonner; Amy N Cohen; Rebecca S Shoai; Ruth Perrin; Edmund Chaney; Alexander S Young
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  A roadmap for national action on clinical decision support.

Authors:  Jerome A Osheroff; Jonathan M Teich; Blackford Middleton; Elaine B Steen; Adam Wright; Don E Detmer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 6.  Specialists versus generalists in the era of pay for performance: "a plague o' both your houses!".

Authors:  David Aron; Leonard Pogach
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-02

Review 7.  Prompting clinicians about preventive care measures: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Judith W Dexheimer; Thomas R Talbot; David L Sanders; S Trent Rosenbloom; Dominik Aronsky
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 8.  Evaluation of outpatient computerized physician medication order entry systems: a systematic review.

Authors:  Saeid Eslami; Ameen Abu-Hanna; Nicolette F de Keizer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Current status and future prospects for electronic point-of-care clinical decision support in diabetes care.

Authors:  Patrick J O'Connor; Jay R Desai; John C Butler; Elyse O Kharbanda; JoAnn M Sperl-Hillen
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 10.  Team-based care and improved blood pressure control: a community guide systematic review.

Authors:  Krista K Proia; Anilkrishna B Thota; Gibril J Njie; Ramona K C Finnie; David P Hopkins; Qaiser Mukhtar; Nicolaas P Pronk; Donald Zeigler; Thomas E Kottke; Kimberly J Rask; Daniel T Lackland; Joy F Brooks; Lynne T Braun; Tonya Cooksey
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 5.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.