Krista K Proia1, Anilkrishna B Thota2, Gibril J Njie1, Ramona K C Finnie1, David P Hopkins1, Qaiser Mukhtar1, Nicolaas P Pronk3, Donald Zeigler4, Thomas E Kottke3, Kimberly J Rask5, Daniel T Lackland6, Joy F Brooks7, Lynne T Braun8, Tonya Cooksey1. 1. Community Guide Branch, Division of Epidemiology, Analysis, and Library Services, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, CDC. 2. Community Guide Branch, Division of Epidemiology, Analysis, and Library Services, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, CDC. Electronic address: athota@cdc.gov. 3. HealthPartners, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 4. American Medical Association , Minneapolis, Minnesota. 5. Emory University, Georgia Medical Care Foundation, Atlanta, Georgia. 6. Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina. 7. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental Control, Columbia. 8. Rush College of Nursing, Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Uncontrolled hypertension remains a widely prevalent cardiovascular risk factor in the U.S. team-based care, established by adding new staff or changing the roles of existing staff such as nurses and pharmacists to work with a primary care provider and the patient. Team-based care has the potential to improve the quality of hypertension management. The goal of this Community Guide systematic review was to examine the effectiveness of team-based care in improving blood pressure (BP) outcomes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: An existing systematic review (search period, January 1980-July 2003) assessing team-based care for BP control was supplemented with a Community Guide update (January 2003-May 2012). For the Community Guide update, two reviewers independently abstracted data and assessed quality of eligible studies. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Twenty-eight studies in the prior review (1980-2003) and an additional 52 studies from the Community Guide update (2003-2012) qualified for inclusion. Results from both bodies of evidence suggest that team-based care is effective in improving BP outcomes. From the update, the proportion of patients with controlled BP improved (median increase=12 percentage points); systolic BP decreased (median reduction=5.4 mmHg); and diastolic BP also decreased (median reduction=1.8 mmHg). CONCLUSIONS: Team-based care increased the proportion of people with controlled BP and reduced both systolic and diastolic BP, especially when pharmacists and nurses were part of the team. Findings are applicable to a range of U.S. settings and population groups. Implementation of this multidisciplinary approach will require health system-level organizational changes and could be an important element of the medical home. Published by Elsevier Inc.
CONTEXT: Uncontrolled hypertension remains a widely prevalent cardiovascular risk factor in the U.S. team-based care, established by adding new staff or changing the roles of existing staff such as nurses and pharmacists to work with a primary care provider and the patient. Team-based care has the potential to improve the quality of hypertension management. The goal of this Community Guide systematic review was to examine the effectiveness of team-based care in improving blood pressure (BP) outcomes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: An existing systematic review (search period, January 1980-July 2003) assessing team-based care for BP control was supplemented with a Community Guide update (January 2003-May 2012). For the Community Guide update, two reviewers independently abstracted data and assessed quality of eligible studies. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Twenty-eight studies in the prior review (1980-2003) and an additional 52 studies from the Community Guide update (2003-2012) qualified for inclusion. Results from both bodies of evidence suggest that team-based care is effective in improving BP outcomes. From the update, the proportion of patients with controlled BP improved (median increase=12 percentage points); systolic BP decreased (median reduction=5.4 mmHg); and diastolic BP also decreased (median reduction=1.8 mmHg). CONCLUSIONS: Team-based care increased the proportion of people with controlled BP and reduced both systolic and diastolic BP, especially when pharmacists and nurses were part of the team. Findings are applicable to a range of U.S. settings and population groups. Implementation of this multidisciplinary approach will require health system-level organizational changes and could be an important element of the medical home. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Diane M Becker; Lisa R Yanek; Wallace R Johnson; Diane Garrett; Taryn F Moy; Stasia Stott Reynolds; Roger S Blumenthal; Dhananjay Vaidya; Lewis C Becker Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Cheryl R Dennison; Wendy S Post; Miyong T Kim; Lee R Bone; David Cohen; Roger S Blumenthal; J Eduardo Rame; Mary C Roary; David M Levine; Martha N Hill Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Donna L McLean; Finlay A McAlister; Jeffery A Johnson; Kathryn M King; Mark J Makowsky; Charlotte A Jones; Ross T Tsuyuki Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2008-11-24
Authors: Nancy T Artinian; John M Flack; Cheryl K Nordstrom; Elaine M Hockman; Olivia G M Washington; Kai-Lin Catherine Jen; Maryam Fathy Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2007 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Herbert C Duber; Isabel A Barata; Eric Cioè-Peña; Stephen Y Liang; Eric Ketcham; Wendy Macias-Konstantopoulos; Shawn A Ryan; Mark Stavros; Lauren K Whiteside Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Catherine G Derington; Jordan B King; Kelsey B Bryant; Blake T McGee; Andrew E Moran; William S Weintraub; Brandon K Bellows; Adam P Bress Journal: Curr Hypertens Rep Date: 2019-11-07 Impact factor: 5.369
Authors: Verughese Jacob; Sajal K Chattopadhyay; Anilkrishna B Thota; Krista K Proia; Gibril Njie; David P Hopkins; Ramona K C Finnie; Nicolaas P Pronk; Thomas E Kottke Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Katherine J Overwyk; Steven P Dehmer; Kakoli Roy; Michael V Maciosek; Yuling Hong; Madeleine M Baker-Goering; Fleetwood Loustalot; Christa-Marie Singleton; Matthew D Ritchey Journal: Med Care Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Maxwell D Anderegg; Tyler H Gums; Liz Uribe; Christopher S Coffey; Paul A James; Barry L Carter Journal: Hypertension Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Karen L Margolis; Steven P Dehmer; JoAnn Sperl-Hillen; Patrick J O'Connor; Stephen E Asche; Anna R Bergdall; Beverly B Green; Rachel A Nyboer; Pamala A Pawloski; Nicole K Trower; Michael V Maciosek Journal: Hypertension Date: 2020-08-31 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Robert M Carey; David A Calhoun; George L Bakris; Robert D Brook; Stacie L Daugherty; Cheryl R Dennison-Himmelfarb; Brent M Egan; John M Flack; Samuel S Gidding; Eric Judd; Daniel T Lackland; Cheryl L Laffer; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Steven M Smith; Sandra J Taler; Stephen C Textor; Tanya N Turan; William B White Journal: Hypertension Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 10.190