Literature DB >> 15037247

The N-terminal coiled coil of the Rhodococcus erythropolis ARC AAA ATPase is neither necessary for oligomerization nor nucleotide hydrolysis.

Xujia Zhang1, Katinka Stoffels, Stephanie Wurzbacher, Geert Schoofs, Günter Pfeifer, Tisha Banerjee, Annabel H A Parret, Wolfgang Baumeister, René De Mot, Peter Zwickl.   

Abstract

Deletion mutants of the Rhodococcus erythropolis ARC AAA ATPase were generated and characterized by biochemical analysis and electron microscopy. Based on sequence comparisons the ARC protein was divided into three consecutive regions, the N-terminal coiled coil, the central ARC-specific inter domain and the C-terminal AAA domain. When the ARC AAA domain was expressed separately it formed aggregates of undefined structure. However, when the AAA domain was expressed in conjunction with the preceeding inter domain, but without the N-terminal coiled coil, high-molecular weight-complexes were formed (ARC-DeltaCC) which showed an N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive ATPase activity. In 2D crystallization experiments the ARC-DeltaCC particles yielded crystals nearly identical to those formed by the wild-type ARC complexes. Thus, the N-terminal coiled coil, which was proposed to have a role in the assembly of and/or interaction between the eukaryotic AAA ATPases in the 26S proteasome, is neither essential for assembly nor for ATP hydrolysis of the ARC ATPase. The N-terminal domain of related AAA ATPases mediates the interaction with substrates or co-factors, suggesting a regulatory function for the N-terminal coiled coil of the ARC ATPase. Surprisingly, the mutant ARC protein ARC-DeltaAAA consisting of the N-terminal coiled coil and the central inter domain, but deleted for the C-terminal AAA domain, was shown to form a dodecameric complex with sixfold symmetry. This suggests an important role of the inter domain for the ordered assembly of the ARC ATPase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15037247     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2003.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Struct Biol        ISSN: 1047-8477            Impact factor:   2.867


  8 in total

1.  Localization of the proteasomal ubiquitin receptors Rpn10 and Rpn13 by electron cryomicroscopy.

Authors:  Eri Sakata; Stefan Bohn; Oana Mihalache; Petra Kiss; Florian Beck; Istvan Nagy; Stephan Nickell; Keiji Tanaka; Yasushi Saeki; Friedrich Förster; Wolfgang Baumeister
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Molecular architecture of the 26S proteasome holocomplex determined by an integrative approach.

Authors:  Keren Lasker; Friedrich Förster; Stefan Bohn; Thomas Walzthoeni; Elizabeth Villa; Pia Unverdorben; Florian Beck; Ruedi Aebersold; Andrej Sali; Wolfgang Baumeister
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Bacterial ubiquitin-like modifier Pup is deamidated and conjugated to substrates by distinct but homologous enzymes.

Authors:  Frank Striebel; Frank Imkamp; Markus Sutter; Martina Steiner; Azad Mamedov; Eilika Weber-Ban
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 15.369

4.  The mycobacterial Mpa-proteasome unfolds and degrades pupylated substrates by engaging Pup's N-terminus.

Authors:  Frank Striebel; Moritz Hunkeler; Heike Summer; Eilika Weber-Ban
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 5.  Bacterial Proteasomes.

Authors:  Jordan B Jastrab; K Heran Darwin
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 15.500

6.  Structural insights on the Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteasomal ATPase Mpa.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Hua Li; Gang Lin; Chunyan Tang; Dongyang Li; Carl Nathan; K Heran Darwin; Huilin Li
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 7.  Prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup), proteasomes and pathogenesis.

Authors:  K Heran Darwin
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 8.  Pupylation versus ubiquitylation: tagging for proteasome-dependent degradation.

Authors:  Kristin E Burns; K Heran Darwin
Journal:  Cell Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 3.715

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.