Literature DB >> 15036589

Auditory-visual temporal integration as a function of distance: no compensation for sound-transmission time in human perception.

Jörg Lewald1, Rainer Guski.   

Abstract

In a psychophysical outdoor experiment with human subjects, the point of subjective simultaneity (PSS) of auditory and visual stimuli was measured for distances from 1 to 50 m. Repetitive sound and light pulses were presented with various stimulus-onset asynchronies, and subjects judged which modality came first. With increasing distance of the stimuli the PSS shifted in a linear relation toward delays of the light behind the sound. The slope of the regression line (3 ms/m) almost exactly corresponded to that of the temporal disparities resulting from the lower velocity of sound compared to light. These data refute the hypothesis proposed recently that there could be an 'implicit estimation' of sound-arrival time. The brain seems to eliminate such crossmodal temporal disparities by the integration of auditory and visual stimuli that fall into a time window, but not by specific compensatory processes that use an estimate of the sound delay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15036589     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2003.12.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  25 in total

1.  Semantic congruency but not temporal synchrony enhances long-term memory performance for audio-visual scenes.

Authors:  Hauke S Meyerhoff; Markus Huff
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-04

2.  Synchronizing to real events: subjective audiovisual alignment scales with perceived auditory depth and speed of sound.

Authors:  David Alais; Simon Carlile
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Transfer of learned perception of sensorimotor simultaneity.

Authors:  Michael J Pesavento; John Schlag
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Recalibration of perceived time across sensory modalities.

Authors:  James V M Hanson; James Heron; David Whitaker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Simultaneity learning in vision, audition, tactile sense and their cross-modal combinations.

Authors:  Veijo Virsu; Henna Oksanen-Hennah; Anita Vedenpää; Pentti Jaatinen; Pekka Lahti-Nuuttila
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Minding time in an amodal representational space.

Authors:  Virginie van Wassenhove
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Stimulus duration influences perceived simultaneity in audiovisual temporal-order judgment.

Authors:  Lars T Boenke; Matthias Deliano; Frank W Ohl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Interactions between the spatial and temporal stimulus factors that influence multisensory integration in human performance.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Juliane Krueger Fister; Zachary P Barnett; Aaron R Nidiffer; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The optimal time window of visual-auditory integration: a reaction time analysis.

Authors:  Hans Colonius; Adele Diederich
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-11

10.  Intermodal attention affects the processing of the temporal alignment of audiovisual stimuli.

Authors:  Durk Talsma; Daniel Senkowski; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.