Literature DB >> 9318294

Dragonfly flight. III. Lift and power requirements.

JM Wakeling1, CP Ellington.   

Abstract

A mean lift coefficient quasi-steady analysis has been applied to the free flight of the dragonfly Sympetrum sanguineum and the damselfly Calopteryx splendens. The analysis accommodated the yaw and accelerations involved in free flight. For any given velocity or resultant aerodynamic force (thrust), the damselfly mean lift coefficient was higher than that for the dragonfly because of its clap and fling. For both species, the maximum mean lift coefficient L was higher than the steady CL,max. Both species aligned their strokes planes to be nearly normal to the thrust, a strategy that reduces the L required for flight and which is different from the previously published hovering and slow dragonfly flights with stroke planes steeply inclined to the horizontal. Owing to the relatively low costs of accelerating the wing, the aerodynamic power required for flight represents the mechanical power output from the muscles. The maximum muscle mass-specific power was estimated at 156 and 166 W kg-1 for S. sanguineum and C. splendens, respectively. Measurements of heat production immediately after flight resulted in mechanical efficiency estimates of 13 % and 9 % for S. sanguineum and C. splendens muscles, respectively.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 9318294     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.200.3.583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  14 in total

1.  Alternative splicing, muscle calcium sensitivity, and the modulation of dragonfly flight performance.

Authors:  J H Marden; G H Fitzhugh; M R Wolf; K D Arnold; B Rowan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-12-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The mechanisms of lift enhancement in insect flight.

Authors:  Fritz-Olaf Lehmann
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-03-04

3.  The power-speed relationship is U-shaped in two free-flying hawkmoths (Manducasexta).

Authors:  Kajsa Warfvinge; Marco KleinHeerenbrink; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Resilin in the flight apparatus of Odonata (Insecta)-cap tendons and their biomechanical importance for flight.

Authors:  Fabian Bäumler; Sebastian Büsse
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Wing shape-mediated carry-over effects of a heat wave during the larval stage on post-metamorphic locomotor ability.

Authors:  Hélène Arambourou; Iago Sanmartín-Villar; Robby Stoks
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Flying in reverse: kinematics and aerodynamics of a dragonfly in backward free flight.

Authors:  Ayodeji T Bode-Oke; Samane Zeyghami; Haibo Dong
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 7.  Aerodynamics, sensing and control of insect-scale flapping-wing flight.

Authors:  Wei Shyy; Chang-Kwon Kang; Pakpong Chirarattananon; Sridhar Ravi; Hao Liu
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.704

8.  The mechanical power requirements of avian flight.

Authors:  G N Askew; D J Ellerby
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Wing shape allometry and aerodynamics in calopterygid damselflies: a comparative approach.

Authors:  David Outomuro; Dean C Adams; Frank Johansson
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Breakup and then makeup: a predictive model of how cilia self-regulate hardness for posture control.

Authors:  Promode R Bandyopadhyay; Joshua C Hansen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.