Kelly M Naugle1, Torrance J Higgins, Todd M Manini. 1. University of Florida, Department of Aging and Geriatric Research, Institute on Aging, PO Box 112610, 2199 Mowry Rd., Gainesville, FL 32611-6110, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between the use of compensatory strategies to successfully complete common daily activities-an indicator of pre-clinical disability-and body mass in pre-clinically disabled older adults. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and fifty-nine pre-clinically disabled older adults defined as having changed the frequency or manner of performing daily tasks without reporting any difficulty. MEASUREMENTS: The use of compensatory strategies were objectively evaluated using the Modification (MOD) scale-a reliable and valid scale for assessing the manner in which common daily activities were completed. Height and weight were measured to classify participants into the following body mass index (BMI) categories: (1) normal: 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2), (2) overweight: 25.0-29.9 kg/m(2), (3) obese class I: 30.0-34.9 kg/m(2), and (4) obese class II: 35.0-39.9 kg/m(2). RESULTS: Compared to other BMI categories, individuals with class II obesity demonstrated a significantly higher probability of using ≥1 compensatory strategies when rising from a chair (30 cm height), kneel to stand, stair ascent, stair descent, and supine to stand tasks. When summarized over all tasks, individuals with class II obesity were 18 times more likely to use extensive compensatory strategies (≥6 on MOD scale) compared to normal weight older adults. Similar trends at a lesser magnitude were found in obese and overweight compared to normal weight older adults. CONCLUSION: Obesity is associated with extensive use of compensatory strategies when performing common daily tasks prior to the onset of perceived difficulty, thus placing them at higher risk of disability compared to their peers with lower body mass. Copyright Â
OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between the use of compensatory strategies to successfully complete common daily activities-an indicator of pre-clinical disability-and body mass in pre-clinically disabled older adults. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and fifty-nine pre-clinically disabled older adults defined as having changed the frequency or manner of performing daily tasks without reporting any difficulty. MEASUREMENTS: The use of compensatory strategies were objectively evaluated using the Modification (MOD) scale-a reliable and valid scale for assessing the manner in which common daily activities were completed. Height and weight were measured to classify participants into the following body mass index (BMI) categories: (1) normal: 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2), (2) overweight: 25.0-29.9 kg/m(2), (3) obese class I: 30.0-34.9 kg/m(2), and (4) obese class II: 35.0-39.9 kg/m(2). RESULTS: Compared to other BMI categories, individuals with class II obesity demonstrated a significantly higher probability of using ≥1 compensatory strategies when rising from a chair (30 cm height), kneel to stand, stair ascent, stair descent, and supine to stand tasks. When summarized over all tasks, individuals with class II obesity were 18 times more likely to use extensive compensatory strategies (≥6 on MOD scale) compared to normal weight older adults. Similar trends at a lesser magnitude were found in obese and overweight compared to normal weight older adults. CONCLUSION:Obesity is associated with extensive use of compensatory strategies when performing common daily tasks prior to the onset of perceived difficulty, thus placing them at higher risk of disability compared to their peers with lower body mass. Copyright Â
Authors: S P Messier; C Legault; R F Loeser; S J Van Arsdale; C Davis; W H Ettinger; P DeVita Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2010-12-04 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Heather K Vincent; Kelley M Lamb; Tim I Day; Susan M Tillman; Kevin R Vincent; Steven Z George Journal: PM R Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Minna Mänty; Ari Heinonen; Raija Leinonen; Timo Törmäkangas; Ritva Sakari-Rantala; Mirja Hirvensalo; Mikaela B von Bonsdorff; Taina Rantanen Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Matthew J Delmonico; Tamara B Harris; Marjolein Visser; Seok Won Park; Molly B Conroy; Pedro Velasquez-Mieyer; Robert Boudreau; Todd M Manini; Michael Nevitt; Anne B Newman; Bret H Goodpaster Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2009-10-28 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Torrance J Higgins; Christopher M Janelle; Kelly M Naugle; Jeffrey Knaggs; Brian M Hoover; Michael Marsiske; Todd M Manini Journal: Arch Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2012-07-06 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: Stephen D Anton; Adam J Woods; Tetso Ashizawa; Diana Barb; Thomas W Buford; Christy S Carter; David J Clark; Ronald A Cohen; Duane B Corbett; Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Vonetta Dotson; Natalie Ebner; Philip A Efron; Roger B Fillingim; Thomas C Foster; David M Gundermann; Anna-Maria Joseph; Christy Karabetian; Christiaan Leeuwenburgh; Todd M Manini; Michael Marsiske; Robert T Mankowski; Heather L Mutchie; Michael G Perri; Sanjay Ranka; Parisa Rashidi; Bhanuprasad Sandesara; Philip J Scarpace; Kimberly T Sibille; Laurence M Solberg; Shinichi Someya; Connie Uphold; Stephanie Wohlgemuth; Samuel Shangwu Wu; Marco Pahor Journal: Ageing Res Rev Date: 2015-10-14 Impact factor: 10.895
Authors: J Fernandes de Souza Barbosa; C Dos Santos Gomes; J Vilton Costa; T Ahmed; M V Zunzunegui; C-L Curcio; F Gomez; R Oliveira Guerra Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Todd M Manini; Daniel P Beavers; Marco Pahor; Jack M Guralnik; Bonnie Spring; Timothy S Church; Abby C King; Sara C Folta; Nancy W Glynn; Anthony P Marsh; Thomas M Gill Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-02-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jason L Rengo; Patrick D Savage; Fuyuki Hirashima; Bruce J Leavitt; Philip A Ades; Michael J Toth Journal: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 2.081