Literature DB >> 15031216

Improving peer review: who's responsible?

Frank Davidoff.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2004        PMID： 15031216      PMCID： PMC381209          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.328.7441.657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Editor's world.

Authors:  F Davidoff
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-06-19       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Measuring the quality of editorial peer review.

Authors:  Tom Jefferson; Elizabeth Wager; Frank Davidoff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-06-05       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Continuing medical education and the physician as a learner: guide to the evidence.

Authors:  Paul E Mazmanian; David A Davis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-09-04       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sara Schroter; Nick Black; Stephen Evans; James Carpenter; Fiona Godlee; Richard Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-02

5.  What is a curriculum?

Authors:  J Ende; F Davidoff
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Masking, blinding, and peer review: the blind leading the blinded.

Authors:  F Davidoff
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies.

Authors:  D A Davis; M A Thomson; A D Oxman; R B Haynes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-09-06       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice.

Authors:  A D Oxman; M A Thomson; D A Davis; R B Haynes
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262
  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Mentored peer reviewing for PhD faculty and students.

Authors:  Jiayun Xu; Kyounghae Kim; Melissa Kurtz; Marie T Nolan
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 3.442

2.  What makes the best medical ethics journal? A North American perspective.

Authors:  J Savulescu; A M Viens
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Authors and publication practices.

Authors:  Michael J G Farthing
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Medical editors and trial reporting: a betrayal of patient care.

Authors:  Elizabeth Wager; Kamran Abbasi
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Non-financial conflicts of interest in academic grant evaluation: a qualitative study of multiple stakeholders in France.

Authors:  Hendy Abdoul; Christophe Perrey; Florence Tubach; Philippe Amiel; Isabelle Durand-Zaleski; Corinne Alberti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  With great power comes great responsibility: the importance of rejection, power, and editors in the practice of scientific publishing.

Authors:  Christopher J Lortie; Stefano Allesina; Lonnie Aarssen; Olyana Grod; Amber E Budden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.