| Literature DB >> 26746591 |
Jiayun Xu1, Kyounghae Kim2, Melissa Kurtz2, Marie T Nolan2.
Abstract
There is a need for scholars to be prepared as peer reviewers in order to ensure the continual publication of quality science. However, developing the skills to craft a constructive critique can be difficult. In this commentary, we discuss the use of a group peer review mentoring model for PhD students to gain experience in peer review from a faculty member who is experienced in peer review. Central to this model, was the opportunity for each student and faculty mentor to openly discuss their critique of the manuscript. Through this enriching experience, novice researchers were able to learn the elements of a good peer review, better determine a manuscript's substantive contribution to science, and advance the quality of their own manuscript writing.Entities:
Keywords: Education; Mentorship; Peer review; Students
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26746591 PMCID: PMC4933839 DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.11.031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nurse Educ Today ISSN: 0260-6917 Impact factor: 3.442