Literature DB >> 9424984

Masking, blinding, and peer review: the blind leading the blinded.

F Davidoff.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9424984     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-128-1-199801010-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Improving peer review: who's responsible?

Authors:  Frank Davidoff
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-20

2.  What makes the best medical ethics journal? A North American perspective.

Authors:  J Savulescu; A M Viens
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Perceptions of ethical problems with scientific journal peer review: an exploratory study.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Christina Gutierrez-Ford; Shyamal Peddada
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Researcher views about funding sources and conflicts of interest in nanotechnology.

Authors:  Katherine A McComas
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 5.  A systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored physical activity and dietary behavior promotion programs: an update.

Authors:  Karen Broekhuizen; Willemieke Kroeze; Mireille N M van Poppel; Anke Oenema; Johannes Brug
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2012-10

6.  Peer review--the newcomers' perspective.

Authors:  Gaell Mainguy; Mohammad R Motamedi; Daniel Mietchen
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 8.029

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.