Literature DB >> 15030422

Electroanatomic versus fluoroscopic mapping for catheter ablation procedures: a prospective randomized study.

Simon C Sporton1, Mark J Earley, Anthony W Nathan, Richard J Schilling.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the routine use of electroanatomic imaging (CARTO) with that of conventional fluoroscopically guided activation mapping (conventional) in an unselected population referred for catheter ablation. We sought to compare the two approaches with respect to procedure outcome and duration, radiation exposure, and cost. METHODS AND
RESULTS: All patients undergoing catheter ablation (with the exception of complete AV nodal ablation) were prospectively randomized to either a CARTO or conventional procedure for mapping and ablation. One hundred two patients were randomized. Acute procedural success was similar with either strategy (CARTO vs conventional 43/47 vs 51/55, P > 0.5), as was procedure duration (144 [58] vs 125 [48] min, P = 0.07 (mean [SD]). CARTO was associated with a substantial reduction in fluoroscopy time (9.3 [7.6] vs 28.8 [19.5] min, P < 0.001) and radiation dose (6.2 [6.1] vs 20.8 [32.7] Gray, P = 0.003). CARTO cases used fewer catheters (2.5 [0.7] vs 4.4 [1.1], P < 0.001), but catheter costs were higher (13.8 vs 9.3 units, P < 0.001, where one unit is equivalent to the cost of a nonsteerable quadripolar catheter).
CONCLUSION: For all catheter ablation procedures, even when a center's "learning curve" for CARTO is included, procedure duration and outcome are similar for CARTO and conventional procedures. CARTO is associated with drastically reduced fluoroscopy time and radiation dose. Although fewer catheters are used with CARTO, catheter costs remain higher.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15030422     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2004.03356.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  39 in total

1.  Magnetocardiography provides non-invasive three-dimensional electroanatomical imaging of cardiac electrophysiology.

Authors:  Riccardo Fenici; Donatella Brisinda
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Radiofrequency ablation of right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia using a magnetic resonance 3D model for interactive catheter guidance.

Authors:  G F Greil; M Gass; V Kuehlkamp; R M Botnar; I Wolf; S Miller; L Sieverding
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Impact of 3D mapping on procedural characteristics and outcomes in cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Emily N Guhl; Evan Adelstein; Andrew Voigt; Norman C Wang; Samir Saba; Sandeep K Jain
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Efficacy of bundle ablation for cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter: combination of the maximum voltage-guided ablation technique and high-density electro-anatomical mapping.

Authors:  Hirokazu Sato; Tetsuo Yagi; Akio Namekawa; Akihiko Ishida; Yoshihiro Yamashina; Takashi Nakagawa; Manjirou Sakuramoto; Eiji Sato; Tomoyuki Yambe
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Fluoroscopy-free recrossing of the interatrial septum during left atrial ablation procedures.

Authors:  Nikola Pavlović; Tobias Reichlin; Michael Kühne; Sven Knecht; Stefan Osswald; Christian Sticherling
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Non-fluoroscopic catheter visualization using MediGuide™ technology: experience from the first 600 procedures.

Authors:  P Sommer; S Richter; G Hindricks; S Rolf
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  A family of intracardiac ultrasound imaging devices designed for guidance of electrophysiology ablation procedures.

Authors:  David J Sahn; Douglas N Stephens; Jonathan M Cannata; K Shung; Omer Oralkan; Amin Nikoozadeh; B T Pierre Khuri-Yakub; Hien Nguyen; Peter Chen; Aaron M Dentinger; Douglas Wildes; Kai E Thomenius; Aman Mahajan; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Matthew O'Donnell
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

9.  Impact of respiration gating on image integration guided atrial fibrillation ablation.

Authors:  Emin Evren Özcan; Gabor Szeplaki; Tamas Tahin; Istvan Osztheimer; Szabolcs Szilagyi; Astrid Apor; Pal Maurovich Horvath; Hajnalka Vago; Béla Merkely; Laszlo Geller
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.460

10.  Multifunctional catheters combining intracardiac ultrasound imaging and electrophysiology sensing.

Authors:  D N Stephens; J Cannata; Ruibin Liu; Jian Zhong Zhao; K K Shung; Hien Nguyen; R Chia; A Dentinger; D Wildes; K E Thomenius; A Mahajan; K Shivkumar; Kang Kim; M O'Donnell; A Nikoozadeh; O Oralkan; P T Khuri-Yakub; D J Sahn
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.