AIM: The purpose of this is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of recrossing the interatrial septum in case of inadvertent loss of or need for repeated left atrial access using a simple electroanatomical landmark without the use of fluoroscopy. METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal (n = 12) or persistent (n = 13) atrial fibrillation ablation were included. All procedures were performed using an electroanatomical mapping system (Carto 3, Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, USA). After fluoroscopy-guided double transseptal puncture and fast anatomical mapping of the left atrium, a reconstruction of the transseptal access was created by retracting the mapping catheter into the sheath to the level of the inferior vena cava. After completing the left sided ablation, both sheaths and catheters were withdrawn to the inferior vena cava. Recrossing was then attempted by fellows (EF) and experienced operators (EO) using the reconstruction of the transseptal access in a standard right anterior oblique (RAO) and left anterior oblique (LAO) projection without the use of fluoroscopy. RESULTS: Using the described technique, EP fellows and experienced operators could recross the interatrial septum without fluoroscopy in all patients. Median time needed for recrossing was 14 s (interquartile range (IQR) 7-20). Median recrossing times did not differ significantly between EF and EO (14 (IQR 8-26.5 s) versus 12 (IQR 6.5-17.5 s), p = 0.26). In five (20 %) procedures, recrossing was necessary during the procedure after intermittent mapping of the right atrium or inadvertent catheter dislodgment. CONCLUSION: Adding a simple and fast anatomical reconstruction of the transseptal access to the standard left atrial mapping procedure allows for easy and fluoroscopy-free recrossing of the interatrial septum during atrial fibrillation ablation and further reduces radiation exposure.
AIM: The purpose of this is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of recrossing the interatrial septum in case of inadvertent loss of or need for repeated left atrial access using a simple electroanatomical landmark without the use of fluoroscopy. METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal (n = 12) or persistent (n = 13) atrial fibrillation ablation were included. All procedures were performed using an electroanatomical mapping system (Carto 3, Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, USA). After fluoroscopy-guided double transseptal puncture and fast anatomical mapping of the left atrium, a reconstruction of the transseptal access was created by retracting the mapping catheter into the sheath to the level of the inferior vena cava. After completing the left sided ablation, both sheaths and catheters were withdrawn to the inferior vena cava. Recrossing was then attempted by fellows (EF) and experienced operators (EO) using the reconstruction of the transseptal access in a standard right anterior oblique (RAO) and left anterior oblique (LAO) projection without the use of fluoroscopy. RESULTS: Using the described technique, EP fellows and experienced operators could recross the interatrial septum without fluoroscopy in all patients. Median time needed for recrossing was 14 s (interquartile range (IQR) 7-20). Median recrossing times did not differ significantly between EF and EO (14 (IQR 8-26.5 s) versus 12 (IQR 6.5-17.5 s), p = 0.26). In five (20 %) procedures, recrossing was necessary during the procedure after intermittent mapping of the right atrium or inadvertent catheter dislodgment. CONCLUSION: Adding a simple and fast anatomical reconstruction of the transseptal access to the standard left atrial mapping procedure allows for easy and fluoroscopy-free recrossing of the interatrial septum during atrial fibrillation ablation and further reduces radiation exposure.
Authors: K J Tucker; A B Curtis; J Murphy; J B Conti; D J Kazakis; E A Geiser; C R Conti Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 1996-03 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Madhu K Natarajan; Narinder Paul; Mathew Mercuri; Edward J Waller; Jonathon Leipsic; Mouhieddin Traboulsi; Hamid S Banijamali; Lee Benson; Tej N Sheth; Christopher S Simpson; Allan Brydie; Michael P Love; Richard Gallo Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2013-09-10 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Bich Lien Nguyen; Jose L Merino; Yehoshua Shachar; Alejandro Estrada; David Doiny; Sergio Castrejon; Bruce Marx; David Johnson; Wanda Marfori; Eli S Gang Journal: J Atr Fibrillation Date: 2013-12-31
Authors: Heiko Lehrmann; Jens Schneider; Amir S Jadidi; Chan-Il Park; Jochen Schiebeling-Römer; Jürgen Allgeier; Thomas Arentz; Reinhold Weber Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2014-01-29
Authors: Ross J Hunter; Ihab Diab; Muzahir Tayebjee; Laura Richmond; Simon Sporton; Mark J Earley; Richard J Schilling Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2011-08-15
Authors: Mark D O'Neill; Matthew Wright; Sébastien Knecht; Pierre Jaïs; Mélèze Hocini; Yoshihide Takahashi; Anders Jönsson; Frédéric Sacher; Seiichiro Matsuo; Kang Teng Lim; Leonardo Arantes; Nicolas Derval; Nicholas Lellouche; Isabelle Nault; Pierre Bordachar; Jacques Clémenty; Michel Haïssaguerre Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2009-03-08 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Roberto De Ponti; Riccardo Cappato; Antonio Curnis; Paolo Della Bella; Luigi Padeletti; Antonio Raviele; Massimo Santini; Jorge A Salerno-Uriarte Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-02-09 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Bradley C Clark; Kohei Sumihara; Robert McCarter; Charles I Berul; Jeffrey P Moak Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Michael Kühne; Sven Knecht; Aline Mühl; Tobias Reichlin; Nikola Pavlović; Arnheid Kessel-Schaefer; Beat A Kaufmann; Beat Schaer; Christian Sticherling; Stefan Osswald Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-01-28 Impact factor: 3.240