Literature DB >> 15026219

Mesophilic and thermophilic temperature co-phase anaerobic digestion compared with single-stage mesophilic- and thermophilic digestion of sewage sludge.

Young-Chae Song1, Sang-Jo Kwon, Jung-Hui Woo.   

Abstract

The performance of thermophilic and mesophilic temperature co-phase anaerobic digestions for sewage sludge, using the exchange process of the digesting sludge between spatially separated mesophilic and thermophilic digesters, was examined, and compared to single-stage mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestions. The reduction of volatile solids from the temperature co-phase anaerobic digestion system was dependent on the sludge exchange rate, but was 50.7-58.8%, which was much higher than 46.8% of single-stage thermophilic digestion, as well as 43.5% of the mesophilic digestion. The specific methane yield was 424-468 mL CH(4) per gram volatile solids removed, which was as good as that of single-stage mesophilic anaerobic digestion. The process stability and the effluent quality in terms of volatile fatty acids and soluble chemical oxygen demand of the temperature co-phase anaerobic digestion system were considerably better than those of the single-stage mesophilic anaerobic processes. The destruction of total coliform in the temperature co-phase system was 98.5-99.6%, which was similar to the single-stage thermophilic digestion. The higher performances on the volatile solid and pathogen reduction, and stable operation of the temperature co-phase anaerobic system might be attributable to the well-functioned thermophilic digester, sharing nutrients and intermediates for anaerobic microorganisms, and selection of higher substrate affinity anaerobic microorganisms in the co-phase system, as a result of the sludge exchange between the mesophilic and thermophilic digesters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15026219     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  7 in total

1.  Methanosarcinaceae and acetate-oxidizing pathways dominate in high-rate thermophilic anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge.

Authors:  Dang P Ho; Paul D Jensen; Damien J Batstone
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Current challenges of high-solid anaerobic digestion and possible measures for its effective applications: a review.

Authors:  Julius G Akinbomi; Regina J Patinvoh; Mohammad J Taherzadeh
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod       Date:  2022-05-18

3.  Thermophilic Alkaline Fermentation Followed by Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion for Efficient Hydrogen and Methane Production from Waste-Activated Sludge: Dynamics of Bacterial Pathogens as Revealed by the Combination of Metagenomic and Quantitative PCR Analyses.

Authors:  Jingjing Wan; Yuhang Jing; Yue Rao; Shicheng Zhang; Gang Luo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Hybrid alkali-hydrodynamic disintegration of waste-activated sludge before two-stage anaerobic digestion process.

Authors:  Klaudiusz Grübel; Jan Suschka
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 5.  Thermophilic versus Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Sewage Sludge: A Comparative Review.

Authors:  Getachew D Gebreeyessus; Pavel Jenicek
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-18

6.  Implementation and process analysis of pilot scale multi-phase anaerobic fermentation and digestion of faecal sludge in Ghana.

Authors:  Justin Shih; Ato Fanyin-Martin; Edris Taher; Kartik Chandran
Journal:  Gates Open Res       Date:  2017-11-06

7.  Temperature Effects on Methanogenesis and Sulfidogenesis during Anaerobic Digestion of Sulfur-Rich Macroalgal Biomass in Sequencing Batch Reactors.

Authors:  Heejung Jung; Jaai Kim; Changsoo Lee
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-12-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.