Literature DB >> 29330191

Thermophilic Alkaline Fermentation Followed by Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion for Efficient Hydrogen and Methane Production from Waste-Activated Sludge: Dynamics of Bacterial Pathogens as Revealed by the Combination of Metagenomic and Quantitative PCR Analyses.

Jingjing Wan1, Yuhang Jing1, Yue Rao1, Shicheng Zhang1,2, Gang Luo3,2.   

Abstract

Thermophilic alkaline fermentation followed by mesophilic anaerobic digestion (TM) for hydrogen and methane production from waste-activated sludge (WAS) was investigated. The TM process was also compared to a process with mesophilic alkaline fermentation followed by a mesophilic anaerobic digestion (MM) and one-stage mesophilic anaerobic digestion (M) process. The results showed that both hydrogen yield (74.5 ml H2/g volatile solids [VS]) and methane yield (150.7 ml CH4/g VS) in the TM process were higher than those (6.7 ml H2/g VS and 127.8 ml CH4/g VS, respectively) in the MM process. The lowest methane yield (101.2 ml CH4/g VS) was obtained with the M process. Taxonomic results obtained from metagenomic analysis showed that different microbial community compositions were established in the hydrogen reactors of the TM and MM processes, which also significantly changed the microbial community compositions in the following methane reactors compared to that with the M process. The dynamics of bacterial pathogens were also evaluated. For the TM process, the reduced diversity and total abundance of bacterial pathogens in WAS were observed in the hydrogen reactor and were further reduced in the methane reactor, as revealed by metagenomic analysis. The results also showed not all bacterial pathogens were reduced in the reactors. For example, Collinsella aerofaciens was enriched in the hydrogen reactor, which was also confirmed by quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis. The study further showed that qPCR was more sensitive for detecting bacterial pathogens than metagenomic analysis. Although there were some differences in the relative abundances of bacterial pathogens calculated by metagenomic and qPCR approaches, both approaches demonstrated that the TM process was more efficient for the removal of bacterial pathogens than the MM and M processes.IMPORTANCE This study developed an efficient process for bioenergy (H2 and CH4) production from WAS and elucidates the dynamics of bacterial pathogens in the process, which is important for the utilization and safe application of WAS. The study also made an attempt to combine metagenomic and qPCR analyses to reveal the dynamics of bacterial pathogens in anaerobic processes, which could overcome the limitations of each method and provide new insights regarding bacterial pathogens in environmental samples.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bacterial pathogens; mesophilic anaerobic digestion; metagenomic analysis; qPCR analysis; thermophilic alkaline fermentation; waste-activated sludge

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29330191      PMCID: PMC5835733          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02632-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  65 in total

1.  Profiling of the metabolically active community from a production-scale biogas plant by means of high-throughput metatranscriptome sequencing.

Authors:  Martha Zakrzewski; Alexander Goesmann; Sebastian Jaenicke; Sebastian Jünemann; Felix Eikmeyer; Rafael Szczepanowski; Waleed Abu Al-Soud; Søren Sørensen; Alfred Pühler; Andreas Schlüter
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 2.  Release and persistence of extracellular DNA in the environment.

Authors:  Kaare M Nielsen; Pål J Johnsen; Douda Bensasson; Daniele Daffonchio
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2007-09-12

3.  Enhancement of sludge anaerobic biodegradability by combined microwave-H2O2 pretreatment in acidic conditions.

Authors:  Parvathy Eswari; S Kavitha; S Kaliappan; Ick-Tae Yeom; J Rajesh Banu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Assessment of free nitrous acid pre-treatment on a mixture of primary sludge and waste activated sludge: Effect of exposure time and concentration.

Authors:  S Zahedi; P Icaran; Z Yuan; M Pijuan
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 9.642

5.  Enhancement of methane production in mesophilic anaerobic digestion of secondary sewage sludge by advanced thermal hydrolysis pretreatment.

Authors:  Jose M Abelleira-Pereira; Sara I Pérez-Elvira; Jezabel Sánchez-Oneto; Roberto de la Cruz; Juan R Portela; Enrique Nebot
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 11.236

6.  Factors controlling pathogen destruction during anaerobic digestion of biowastes.

Authors:  S R Smith; N L Lang; K H M Cheung; K Spanoudaki
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 7.145

7.  Anaerobic digestion of chemically enhanced primary treatment (CEPT) sludge and the microbial community structure.

Authors:  Feng Ju; Yubo Wang; Frankie T K Lau; W C Fung; Danping Huang; Yu Xia; Tong Zhang
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Influence of high gas production during thermophilic anaerobic digestion in pilot-scale and lab-scale reactors on survival of the thermotolerant pathogens Clostridium perfringens and Campylobacter jejuni in piggery wastewater.

Authors:  L C Skillman; O Bajsa; L Ho; B Santhanam; M Kumar; G Ho
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  Mesophilic and thermophilic temperature co-phase anaerobic digestion compared with single-stage mesophilic- and thermophilic digestion of sewage sludge.

Authors:  Young-Chae Song; Sang-Jo Kwon; Jung-Hui Woo
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 11.236

10.  Metagenomic microbial community profiling using unique clade-specific marker genes.

Authors:  Nicola Segata; Levi Waldron; Annalisa Ballarini; Vagheesh Narasimhan; Olivier Jousson; Curtis Huttenhower
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 28.547

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.