Literature DB >> 23956388

Methanosarcinaceae and acetate-oxidizing pathways dominate in high-rate thermophilic anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge.

Dang P Ho1, Paul D Jensen, Damien J Batstone.   

Abstract

This study investigated the process of high-rate, high-temperature methanogenesis to enable very-high-volume loading during anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge. Reducing the hydraulic retention time (HRT) from 15 to 20 days in mesophilic digestion down to 3 days was achievable at a thermophilic temperature (55°C) with stable digester performance and methanogenic activity. A volatile solids (VS) destruction efficiency of 33 to 35% was achieved on waste-activated sludge, comparable to that obtained via mesophilic processes with low organic acid levels (<200 mg/liter chemical oxygen demand [COD]). Methane yield (VS basis) was 150 to 180 liters of CH4/kg of VS(added). According to 16S rRNA pyrotag sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), the methanogenic community was dominated by members of the Methanosarcinaceae, which have a high level of metabolic capability, including acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis. Loss of function at an HRT of 2 days was accompanied by a loss of the methanogens, according to pyrotag sequencing. The two acetate conversion pathways, namely, acetoclastic methanogenesis and syntrophic acetate oxidation, were quantified by stable carbon isotope ratio mass spectrometry. The results showed that the majority of methane was generated by nonacetoclastic pathways, both in the reactors and in off-line batch tests, confirming that syntrophic acetate oxidation is a key pathway at elevated temperatures. The proportion of methane due to acetate cleavage increased later in the batch, and it is likely that stable oxidation in the continuous reactor was maintained by application of the consistently low retention time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23956388      PMCID: PMC3811223          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01730-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  32 in total

1.  Effects of temperature and hydraulic retention time on anaerobic digestion of food waste.

Authors:  Jung Kon Kim; Baek Rock Oh; Young Nam Chun; Si Wouk Kim
Journal:  J Biosci Bioeng       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Towards the definition of a core of microorganisms involved in anaerobic digestion of sludge.

Authors:  Delphine Rivière; Virginie Desvignes; Eric Pelletier; Sébastien Chaussonnerie; Sonda Guermazi; Jean Weissenbach; Tianlun Li; Patricia Camacho; Abdelghani Sghir
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays.

Authors:  I Angelidaki; M Alves; D Bolzonella; L Borzacconi; J L Campos; A J Guwy; S Kalyuzhnyi; P Jenicek; J B van Lier
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.915

4.  Acetate oxidation is the dominant methanogenic pathway from acetate in the absence of Methanosaetaceae.

Authors:  Dimitar Karakashev; Damien J Batstone; Eric Trably; Irini Angelidaki
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Syntrophaceticus schinkii gen. nov., sp. nov., an anaerobic, syntrophic acetate-oxidizing bacterium isolated from a mesophilic anaerobic filter.

Authors:  Maria Westerholm; Stefan Roos; Anna Schnürer
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 2.742

6.  Hydrogen production by methanogens under low-hydrogen conditions.

Authors:  D L Valentine; D C Blanton; W S Reeburgh
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.552

7.  The Methanosarcina barkeri genome: comparative analysis with Methanosarcina acetivorans and Methanosarcina mazei reveals extensive rearrangement within methanosarcinal genomes.

Authors:  Dennis L Maeder; Iain Anderson; Thomas S Brettin; David C Bruce; Paul Gilna; Cliff S Han; Alla Lapidus; William W Metcalf; Elizabeth Saunders; Roxanne Tapia; Kevin R Sowers
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Syntrophic acetate-oxidizing microbes in methanogenic environments.

Authors:  Satoshi Hattori
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Methanosarcina spp. drive vinyl chloride dechlorination via interspecies hydrogen transfer.

Authors:  Axel C Heimann; Damien J Batstone; Rasmus Jakobsen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Mesophilic and thermophilic temperature co-phase anaerobic digestion compared with single-stage mesophilic- and thermophilic digestion of sewage sludge.

Authors:  Young-Chae Song; Sang-Jo Kwon; Jung-Hui Woo
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 11.236

View more
  15 in total

1.  Effect of the Organic Loading Rate Increase and the Presence of Zeolite on Microbial Community Composition and Process Stability During Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Wastes.

Authors:  Elvira E Ziganshina; Dmitry E Belostotskiy; Olga N Ilinskaya; Eugenia A Boulygina; Tatiana V Grigoryeva; Ayrat M Ziganshin
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Vertical distribution of archaeal communities associated with anaerobic degradation of pentabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-99) in river-based groundwater recharge with reclaimed water.

Authors:  Yulin Yan; Mengsi Ma; Xiang Liu; Weifang Ma; Yangyao Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Complex coupled metabolic and prokaryotic community responses to increasing temperatures in anaerobic marine sediments: critical temperatures and substrate changes.

Authors:  Erwan G Roussel; Barry A Cragg; Gordon Webster; Henrik Sass; Xiaohong Tang; Angharad S Williams; Roberta Gorra; Andrew J Weightman; R John Parkes
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.194

4.  An integrated approach for efficient biomethane production from solid bio-wastes in a compact system.

Authors:  Haoyu Wang; Yu Tao; Margarida Temudo; Margot Schooneveld; Henk Bijl; Nanqi Ren; Monika Wolf; Cornelia Heine; Anne Foerster; Vincent Pelenc; Joris Kloek; Jules B van Lier; Merle de Kreuk
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 6.040

5.  Mesophilic versus thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle manure: methane productivity and microbial ecology.

Authors:  Veronica Moset; Morten Poulsen; Radziah Wahid; Ole Højberg; Henrik Bjarne Møller
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 5.813

6.  Microbial Insight into a Pilot-Scale Enhanced Two-Stage High-Solid Anaerobic Digestion System Treating Waste Activated Sludge.

Authors:  Jing Wu; Zhiping Cao; Yuying Hu; Xiaolu Wang; Guangqi Wang; Jiane Zuo; Kaijun Wang; Yi Qian
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Molecular Microbial Community Analysis as an Analysis Tool for Optimal Biogas Production.

Authors:  Seyedbehnam Hashemi; Sayed Ebrahim Hashemi; Kristian M Lien; Jacob J Lamb
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-05-28

8.  Physico-chemical pretreatment and fungal biotreatment for park wastes and cattle dung for biogas production.

Authors:  Sameh S Ali; Jianzhong Sun
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-11-20

9.  Investigation into the effect of high concentrations of volatile fatty acids in anaerobic digestion on methanogenic communities.

Authors:  Ingrid H Franke-Whittle; Andreas Walter; Christian Ebner; Heribert Insam
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 7.145

10.  High-rate, High Temperature Acetotrophic Methanogenesis Governed by a Three Population Consortium in Anaerobic Bioreactors.

Authors:  Dang Ho; Paul Jensen; Maria-Luisa Gutierrez-Zamora; Sabrina Beckmann; Mike Manefield; Damien Batstone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.