Literature DB >> 15025724

Current clinical selection strategies for identification of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer families are inadequate: a meta-analysis.

W Kievit1, J H F M de Bruin, E M M Adang, M J L Ligtenberg, F M Nagengast, J H J M van Krieken, N Hoogerbrugge.   

Abstract

Present guidelines to identify hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) families are criticized for limitations in accuracy. The Amsterdam criteria I and II (AC I and AC II) are used to predict a germline mutation in one of the mismatch repair genes. In families not fulfilling the AC I and AC II criteria, individual indications to test cancer specimens for microsatellite instability (MSI) are guided by the Bethesda Guidelines (BG). Germline mutation testing is then performed in patients who conform to the BG and show MSI. We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of AC I, AC II, and BG. A meta-analysis of studies on the value of the AC I and AC II criteria for predicting germline mutation, as well as a meta-analysis of BG for the detection of MSI was performed. For the AC I, sensitivity varied from 54 to 91% and specificity varied from 62 to 84%. For the AC II, the pooled sensitivity was 78% and specificity ranged between 46 and 68%. Post-test probabilities of a positive test result were 0.61 and 0.46 for the AC I and AC II, respectively. Post-test probabilities of a negative test result were 0.17 and 0.21 for the AC I and AC II, respectively. For the BG, the pooled sensitivity was 89% and pooled specificity was 53%. Post-test probability of a positive test result was 41%, and post-test probability of a negative test result was 9%. The sensitivity and specificity of the Amsterdam criteria for predicting a germline mutation that causes HNPCC is not sufficient. The BG are useful for the detection of MSI in a group of patients suspected of having familial colorectal cancer (CRC), but sensitivity is very low in the total group of newly diagnosed CRC patients. Therefore, a new strategy is needed for the identification of HNPCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15025724     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2004.00220.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  15 in total

Review 1.  Lower gastrointestinal tract cancer predisposition syndromes.

Authors:  Neel B Shah; Noralane M Lindor
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.722

2.  Assessing the predictive accuracy of hMLH1 and hMSH2 mutation probability models.

Authors:  Kory W Jasperson; Katrina Lowstuter; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Lynch syndrome: clinical, pathological, and genetic insights.

Authors:  Ralph Schneider; Claudia Schneider; Matthias Kloor; Alois Fürst; Gabriela Möslein
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Prevalence of alterations in DNA mismatch repair genes in patients with young-onset colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Paul J Limburg; William S Harmsen; Helen H Chen; Steven Gallinger; Robert W Haile; John A Baron; Graham Casey; Michael O Woods; Stephen N Thibodeau; Noralane M Lindor
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  Genetic counseling outcomes: perceived risk and distress after counseling for hereditary colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ann-Marie Codori; Tracy Waldeck; Gloria M Petersen; Diana Miglioretti; Jill D Trimbath; Miriam A Tillery
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Mismatch repair deficiency screening via immunohistochemical staining in young Asians with colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Min-Hoe Chew; Poh-Koon Koh; Melinda Tan; Kiat-Hon Lim; Loi Carol; Choong-Leong Tang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  A state-wide population-based program for detection of lynch syndrome based upon immunohistochemical and molecular testing of colorectal tumours.

Authors:  Lyn Schofield; Fabienne Grieu; Jack Goldblatt; Benhur Amanuel; Barry Iacopetta
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Lynch syndrome in Tunisia: first description of clinical features and germline mutations.

Authors:  Sana Aissi-Ben Moussa; Amel Moussa; Nadia Kourda; Amel Mezlini; Nabil Abdelli; Farid Zerimech; Taoufik Najjar; Sarah Ben Jilani; Nicole Porchet; Farhat Ben Ayed; Mohamed Manai; Marie-Pierre Buisine
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Tumor characteristics as an analytic tool for classifying genetic variants of uncertain clinical significance.

Authors:  Robert M W Hofstra; Amanda B Spurdle; Diana Eccles; William D Foulkes; Niels de Wind; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Frans B L Hogervorst
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.878

10.  The identification of Lynch syndrome in British Columbia.

Authors:  Carol M Cremin; Linlea Armstrong; Sharlene Gill; David Huntsman; Chris Bajdik
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.522

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.