Literature DB >> 22362054

Lynch syndrome: clinical, pathological, and genetic insights.

Ralph Schneider1, Claudia Schneider, Matthias Kloor, Alois Fürst, Gabriela Möslein.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Lynch syndrome as the most common hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome and the most common cause of hereditary endometrial cancer is characterized by an autosomal dominant inheritance with a penetrance of 85-90%. The molecular genetic underlying mechanism is a mutation in one of the mismatch repair genes.
METHODS: In order to identify patients with Lynch syndrome, a nuclear family history should be ascertained and matched with the Amsterdam criteria. A different approach for identification is the adherence to Bethesda criteria and subsequent testing for microsatellite instability. In patients with unstable tumors as an indicator for mismatch repair deficiency, genetic counseling and mutation analysis are warranted. For families fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria, intensified screening is recommended, even if a pathogenic mutation is not identified.
RESULTS: Individuals from families with a proven pathogenic mutation that are tested negative are at normal population risk for cancers and may be dismissed from intensified surveillance. Prophylactic surgery in high-risk individuals without neoplasia is not generally recommended. At the time of a colon primary, however, extended surgery should be discussed in the light of a high rate of metachronous cancers. The worries of impairing functional results have now been evaluated in the light of quality of life in a large international cohort. Interestingly, extended (prophylactic) surgery does not lead to inferior quality of life with equal perioperative risks.
CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, taking the risk reduction into account, extended surgery at the time of the first colon primary should at least be discussed, if not recommended. Also, prophylactic hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy at the time of a colorectal primary should be recommended if family planning has been completed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22362054     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-012-0918-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  126 in total

1.  Predictive and prognostic roles of BRAF mutation in stage III colon cancer: results from intergroup trial CALGB 89803.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Kaori Shima; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Nadine J McCleary; Kimmie Ng; Donna Hollis; Leonard B Saltz; Robert J Mayer; Paul Schaefer; Renaud Whittom; Alexander Hantel; Al B Benson; Donna Spiegelman; Richard M Goldberg; Monica M Bertagnolli; Charles S Fuchs
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  The association of the BRAF(V600E) mutation with prognostic factors and poor clinical outcome in papillary thyroid cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tae Hyuk Kim; Young Joo Park; Jung Ah Lim; Hwa Young Ahn; Eun Kyung Lee; You Jin Lee; Kyung Won Kim; Seo Kyung Hahn; Yeo Kyu Youn; Kwang Hyun Kim; Bo Youn Cho; Do Joon Park
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Surveillance for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a long-term study on 114 families.

Authors:  Wouter H de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel; Fokko M Nagengast; Gerrit Griffioen; Fred H Menko; Babs G Taal; Jan H Kleibeuker; Hans F Vasen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Histopathology of colorectal carcinomas and adenomas in cancer family syndrome.

Authors:  J P Mecklin; P Sipponen; H J Järvinen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  The frequency of hereditary defective mismatch repair in a prospective series of unselected colorectal carcinomas.

Authors:  J M Cunningham; C Y Kim; E R Christensen; D J Tester; Y Parc; L J Burgart; K C Halling; S K McDonnell; D J Schaid; C Walsh Vockley; V Kubly; H Nelson; V V Michels; S N Thibodeau
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-08-24       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 6.  Molecular genetics and clinical-pathology features of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma (Lynch syndrome): historical journey from pedigree anecdote to molecular genetic confirmation.

Authors:  H T Lynch; T Smyrk; J F Lynch
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.935

7.  CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) of colorectal cancer is best characterised by quantitative DNA methylation analysis and prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  S Ogino; M Cantor; T Kawasaki; M Brahmandam; G J Kirkner; D J Weisenberger; M Campan; P W Laird; M Loda; C S Fuchs
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  The epidemiology of endometrial cancer in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  H F Vasen; P Watson; J P Mecklin; J R Jass; J S Green; T Nomizu; H Müller; H T Lynch
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.480

9.  Pathology features in Bethesda guidelines predict colorectal cancer microsatellite instability: a population-based study.

Authors:  Mark A Jenkins; Shinichi Hayashi; Anne-Marie O'Shea; Lawrence J Burgart; Tom C Smyrk; David Shimizu; Paul M Waring; Andrew R Ruszkiewicz; Aaron F Pollett; Mark Redston; Melissa A Barker; John A Baron; Graham R Casey; James G Dowty; Graham G Giles; Paul Limburg; Polly Newcomb; Joanne P Young; Michael D Walsh; Stephen N Thibodeau; Noralane M Lindor; Loïc Lemarchand; Steven Gallinger; Robert W Haile; John D Potter; John L Hopper; Jeremy R Jass
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer is associated with local lymphocyte infiltration and low frequency of distant metastases.

Authors:  A Buckowitz; H-P Knaebel; A Benner; H Bläker; J Gebert; P Kienle; M von Knebel Doeberitz; M Kloor
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-05-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Clinical significance of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Matthias Kloor; Laura Staffa; Aysel Ahadova; Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Colorectal carcinoma: Pathologic aspects.

Authors:  Matthew Fleming; Sreelakshmi Ravula; Sergei F Tatishchev; Hanlin L Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2012-09

3.  [Aspirin and prevention of colorectal carcinomas].

Authors:  K Schrör; B H Rauch
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  Endometrial cancer and microsatellite instability status.

Authors:  Daiva Kanopiene; Jolanta Vidugiriene; Konstantinas Povilas Valuckas; Giedre Smailyte; Saule Uleckiene; Jeff Bacher
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2014-11-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.