Literature DB >> 15018114

Practical consideration for 3T imaging.

Weili Lin1, Hongyu An, Yasheng Chen, Peter Nicholas, GuiHua Zhai, Guido Gerig, John Gilmore, Elizabeth Bullitt.   

Abstract

In the past 10 to 15 years, 1.5T has been one of the most commonly used field strengths for day-to-day clinical operations. However, recent advances in high field technology and the increased availability of high field (> 1.5T) human scanners have opened the doors for a variety of exciting improvements in clinical and research applications of MR imaging. In particular, 3T has continued to gain wide acceptance as one of the main field strengths for clinical and research studies. Therefore, in this article the authors focus on the pros and cons of 3T imaging and comparisons between results obtained at 3T and 1.5T.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15018114     DOI: 10.1016/s1064-9689(03)00068-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am        ISSN: 1064-9689            Impact factor:   2.266


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of meglumine gadoterate-enhanced MR angiography (MRA) compared with time-of-flight MRA in the diagnosis of clinically significant non-coronary arterial disease: a pooled analysis of data from two clinical trials.

Authors:  D J Shah; T-H Lim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Advantages and pitfalls in 3T MR brain imaging: a pictorial review.

Authors:  Bernd L Schmitz; Andrik J Aschoff; Martin H K Hoffmann; Georg Grön
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Whole-body MRI at high field: technical limits and clinical potential.

Authors:  Fritz Schick
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  MRA of abdominal vessels: technical advances.

Authors:  Henrik J Michaely; Olaf Dietrich; Kambiz Nael; Sabine Weckbach; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Bilateral ce-MR angiography of the hands at 3.0 T and 1.5 T: intraindividual comparison of quantitative and qualitative image parameters in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Jan Thorsten Winterer; Olaf Moske-Eick; Michael Markl; Alexander Frydrychowicz; Thorsten Alexander Bley; Mathias Langer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  High-resolution myocardial perfusion imaging at 3 T: comparison to 1.5 T in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  K Strach; C Meyer; D Thomas; C P Naehle; C Schmitz; H Litt; A Bernstein; B Cheng; H Schild; T Sommer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  High-resolution myocardial stress perfusion at 3 T in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Carsten Meyer; Katharina Strach; Daniel Thomas; Harold Litt; Claas P Nähle; Klaus Tiemann; Ulrich Schwenger; Hans H Schild; Torsten Sommer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Advances in magnetic resonance neuroimaging.

Authors:  Michael E Moseley; Chunlei Liu; Sandra Rodriguez; Thomas Brosnan
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.806

9.  3 T magnetic resonance imaging of the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; N Biccari; F Mangano; R Toffanin
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  MR imaging of hyperacute subarachnoid and intraventricular hemorrhage at 3T: a preliminary report of gradient echo T2*-weighted sequences.

Authors:  Chul-Ho Sohn; Seung-Kug Baik; Hee-Jung Lee; Sung-Moon Lee; Il-Man Kim; Man-Bin Yim; Jae-Suk Hwang; M Louis Lauzon; Robert J Sevick
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.