Literature DB >> 15017203

Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for the detection of tumor foci in men with prior negative transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy.

J S P Yuen1, C H Thng, P H Tan, L W Khin, S J L Phee, D Xiao, W K O Lau, W S Ng, C W S Cheng.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determined the ability of combined endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) to detect prostate cancer foci prospectively in men with prior negative transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) prostate biopsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Endorectal MRI with spectroscopy was performed in 24 consecutive patients with 1 or more prior negative TRUS prostatic biopsies for persistently increased prostate specific antigen and/or abnormal digital rectal examination. All studies were interpreted by a dedicated radiologist who reported areas of interest in the peripheral zone as normal, equivocal or suspicious on MRI and MRSI separately. Equivocal and suspicious areas were then correlated with a 3-dimensional prostate model. All patients underwent a standard TRUS 10-core peripheral zone biopsy with up to 4 additional biopsies targeted at the equivocal or suspected sites.
RESULTS: Prostate cancer was detected in 7 of 24 subjects (29.2%). Considering the equivocal category as test negative the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and the accuracy of MRI, MRSI and combined MRI/MRSI for the detection of prostate cancer were 57.1%, 57.1% and 100.0%, 88.2%, 82.4% and 70.6%, 66.7%, 57.1% and 58.3%, 83.3%, 82.1% and 100%, and 79.2%, 75.0% and 79.2%, respectively. The site of positive biopsy correlated correctly in 50% and 28.6% of MRI and MRSI labeled suspicious cores, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: MRI and MRSI have the potential to identify cancer foci and direct TRUS in patients with a previous negative TRUS biopsy. Further, larger studies are required to quantify the amount of benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15017203     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000118380.90871.ef

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  33 in total

1.  MRI-guided prostate biopsy detects clinically significant cancer: analysis of a cohort of 100 patients after previous negative TRUS biopsy.

Authors:  M Roethke; A G Anastasiadis; M Lichy; M Werner; P Wagner; S Kruck; Claus D Claussen; A Stenzl; H P Schlemmer; D Schilling
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Investigation of the PSF-choice method for reduced lipid contamination in prostate MR spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Lawrence P Panych; Joseph R Roebuck; Nan-kuei Chen; Yi Tang; Bruno Madore; Clare M Tempany; Robert V Mulkern
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Reproducibility of image interpretation in MRI of the prostate: application of the sextant framework by two different radiologists.

Authors:  Ullrich Mueller-Lisse; Ulrike Mueller-Lisse; Juergen Scheidler; Gerhardt Klein; Maximilian Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Prostate MR imaging at high-field strength: evolution or revolution?

Authors:  Olivier Rouvière; Robert P Hartman; Denis Lyonnet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-09-10       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Biexponential characterization of prostate tissue water diffusion decay curves over an extended b-factor range.

Authors:  Robert V Mulkern; Agnieszka Szot Barnes; Steven J Haker; Yin P Hung; Frank J Rybicki; Stephan E Maier; Clare M C Tempany
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 6.  Metabolomic imaging of prostate cancer with magnetic resonance spectroscopy and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Eva-Margarete Spur; Emily A Decelle; Leo L Cheng
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Contemporary issues in the diagnosis of prostate cancer for the radiologist.

Authors:  Richard Clements
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Combined magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin Umbehr; Lucas M Bachmann; Ulrike Held; Thomas M Kessler; Tullio Sulser; Dominik Weishaupt; John Kurhanewicz; Johann Steurer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 9.  Prostate cancer: diagnosis and staging.

Authors:  Nigel Borley; Mark R Feneley
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  A meta-analysis of the accuracy of prostate cancer studies which use magnetic resonance spectroscopy as a diagnostic tool.

Authors:  Peng Wang; You-min Guo; Min Liu; Yong-qian Qiang; Xiao-juan Guo; Yi-li Zhang; Xiao-Yi Duan; Qiu-Juan Zhang; Weifeng Liang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.