Literature DB >> 15010185

Effects of food unit size and energy density on intake in humans.

Amy Ann Devitt1, Richard D Mattes.   

Abstract

The effects of food unit size (FU) and energy density (ED) on food consumption were explored in 20 adults using a within subjects 2 x 2 design study. The four food treatment combinations were provided in the laboratory in random order on four non-consecutive days. The foods differed in FU (small food unit (SFU) or customary food unit (CFU)) and energy density, by manipulating fat content (low (LED) or high (HED)). Appetitive responses and total grams and kilocalories consumed were monitored. Hunger, fullness, desire to eat and prospective consumption ratings were not significantly different between treatments. Gram weight of food consumed was constant across all treatments. Energy intake of HED foods was greater than LED foods independent of food unit size for breakfast (F(1,17) = 11.77, p < 0.001), lunch (F(1,17) = 4.70, p < 0.05) and the 24 h period (F(1,17) = 8.99, p < 0.001) but only tended to be increased at dinner. In summary, appetitive sensations were not markedly altered by food unit size or energy density. The daily gram weight of food consumed and appetitive ratings were relatively consistent across treatments resulting in higher energy intake with HED foods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15010185     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2003.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  16 in total

Review 1.  Relationships between human thirst, hunger, drinking, and feeding.

Authors:  Fiona McKiernan; Jenny A Houchins; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-04-13

Review 2.  Energy density, energy intake, and body weight regulation in adults.

Authors:  J Philip Karl; Susan B Roberts
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 3.  Portion size and obesity.

Authors:  M Barbara E Livingstone; L Kirsty Pourshahidi
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 4.  Weighing the Evidence of Common Beliefs in Obesity Research.

Authors:  Krista Casazza; Andrew Brown; Arne Astrup; Fredrik Bertz; Charles Baum; Michelle Bohan Brown; John Dawson; Nefertiti Durant; Gareth Dutton; David A Fields; Kevin R Fontaine; Steven Heymsfield; David Levitsky; Tapan Mehta; Nir Menachemi; P K Newby; Russell Pate; Hollie Raynor; Barbara J Rolls; Bisakha Sen; Daniel L Smith; Diana Thomas; Brian Wansink; David B Allison
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 11.176

5.  Incorporation of air into a snack food reduces energy intake.

Authors:  Kathrin M Osterholt; Liane S Roe; Barbara J Rolls
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2006-12-26       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  High-fibre, low-fat diet predicts long-term weight loss and decreased type 2 diabetes risk: the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study.

Authors:  J Lindström; M Peltonen; J G Eriksson; A Louheranta; M Fogelholm; M Uusitupa; J Tuomilehto
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 7.  Hunger and thirst: issues in measurement and prediction of eating and drinking.

Authors:  Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-01-11

8.  Do calorie-controlled portion sizes of snacks reduce energy intake?

Authors:  Nanette Stroebele; Lorraine G Ogden; James O Hill
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 9.  Does food marketing need to make us fat? A review and solutions.

Authors:  Pierre Chandon; Brian Wansink
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.846

Review 10.  Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco.

Authors:  Gareth J Hollands; Ian Shemilt; Theresa M Marteau; Susan A Jebb; Hannah B Lewis; Yinghui Wei; Julian P T Higgins; David Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.