Literature DB >> 15009150

Auditory perception vs. recognition: representation of complex communication sounds in the mouse auditory cortical fields.

Diana B Geissler1, Günter Ehret.   

Abstract

Details of brain areas for acoustical Gestalt perception and the recognition of species-specific vocalizations are not known. Here we show how spectral properties and the recognition of the acoustical Gestalt of wriggling calls of mouse pups based on a temporal property are represented in auditory cortical fields and an association area (dorsal field) of the pups' mothers. We stimulated either with a call model releasing maternal behaviour at a high rate (call recognition) or with two models of low behavioural significance (perception without recognition). Brain activation was quantified using c-Fos immunocytochemistry, counting Fos-positive cells in electrophysiologically mapped auditory cortical fields and the dorsal field. A frequency-specific labelling in two primary auditory fields is related to call perception but not to the discrimination of the biological significance of the call models used. Labelling related to call recognition is present in the second auditory field (AII). A left hemisphere advantage of labelling in the dorsoposterior field seems to reflect an integration of call recognition with maternal responsiveness. The dorsal field is activated only in the left hemisphere. The spatial extent of Fos-positive cells within the auditory cortex and its fields is larger in the left than in the right hemisphere. Our data show that a left hemisphere advantage in processing of a species-specific vocalization up to recognition is present in mice. The differential representation of vocalizations of high vs. low biological significance, as seen only in higher-order and not in primary fields of the auditory cortex, is discussed in the context of perceptual strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15009150     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03205.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  29 in total

1.  Time course of embryonic midbrain and thalamic auditory connection development in mice as revealed by carbocyanine dye tracing.

Authors:  Bina Gurung; Bernd Fritzsch
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Comparison of midbrain and thalamic space-specific neurons in barn owls.

Authors:  María Lucía Pérez; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Large-scale imaging of cortical dynamics during sensory perception and behavior.

Authors:  Joseph B Wekselblatt; Erik D Flister; Denise M Piscopo; Cristopher M Niell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Early stages of melody processing: stimulus-sequence and task-dependent neuronal activity in monkey auditory cortical fields A1 and R.

Authors:  Pingbo Yin; Mortimer Mishkin; Mitchell Sutter; Jonathan B Fritz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Primate auditory recognition memory performance varies with sound type.

Authors:  Chi-Wing Ng; Bethany Plakke; Amy Poremba
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Effects of damage to auditory cortex on the discrimination of speech sounds by rats.

Authors:  Owen R Floody; Ladislav Ouda; Benjamin A Porter; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-05-24

Review 7.  Auditory cortex of bats and primates: managing species-specific calls for social communication.

Authors:  Jagmeet S Kanwal; Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2007-05-01

8.  Multiscale optical Ca2+ imaging of tonal organization in mouse auditory cortex.

Authors:  John B Issa; Benjamin D Haeffele; Amit Agarwal; Dwight E Bergles; Eric D Young; David T Yue
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Emergent selectivity for task-relevant stimuli in higher-order auditory cortex.

Authors:  Serin Atiani; Stephen V David; Diego Elgueda; Michael Locastro; Susanne Radtke-Schuller; Shihab A Shamma; Jonathan B Fritz
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Social and emotional values of sounds influence human (Homo sapiens) and non-human primate (Cercopithecus campbelli) auditory laterality.

Authors:  Muriel Basile; Alban Lemasson; Catherine Blois-Heulin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.