Literature DB >> 15005466

The development of cytogenetically normal, abnormal and mosaic embryos: a theoretical model.

Frans J Los1, Diane Van Opstal, Cardi van den Berg.   

Abstract

Assisted reproduction and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) involve various complicated techniques, each of them with its own problems. However, the greatest problem with PGD for chromosome abnormalities is not of a technical nature but is a biological phenomenon: chromosomal mosaicism in the cleavage stage embryo. Here, we present a hypothetical, quantitative model for the development of chromosomally normal, abnormal and mosaic embryos. The arising of mosaicism in 2-8-cell embryos was described by a binomial probability model on the occurrence of mitotic events inducing chromosomal changes in the blastomeres. This model converted the 'mean' rate of mosaicism found in cross-sectional studies (60%) into an equal rate of mosaic embryos at arrival at the 8-cell stage (59.8%). The disappearance of > 90% of the mosaic embryos or the mosaicism itself from surviving embryos during the morula stage was explained by mitotic arrest of most of the mitotically changed cells under increasing cell cycle control. In our model, 25.9 and 14.3% of the embryos at the 8-cell stage are normal and abnormal respectively. The remaining 59.8% of the embryo shows mosaicism: 34.6% of abnormal/normal cells and 25.2% of abnormal/abnormal cells. The high proportion of abnormal and mosaic embryos together explains the high rate of abnormal laboratory findings in PGD for chromosomal abnormalities and aneuploidy screening. The poor representation of a 1- or 2-cell biopsy for the 7- or 6-cell post-biopsy embryo in the case of mosaicism explains the high rate of false-negative and false-positive results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15005466     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmh005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of growth rates of fresh and frozen-thawed embryos according to chromosomal status.

Authors:  Rohini Edirisinghe; Rodney Jemmott; John Allan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  PGS-FISH in reproductive medicine and perspective directions for improvement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sandra Zamora; Ana Clavero; M Carmen Gonzalvo; Juan de Dios Luna Del Castillo; Jose Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes; Juan Mozas; Jose Antonio Castilla
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Chromosomal integrity of human preimplantation embryos at different days post fertilization.

Authors:  Michal Dekel-Naftali; Ayala Aviram-Goldring; Talia Litmanovitch; Jana Shamash; Hagith Yonath; Ariel Hourvitz; Yuval Yung; Masha Brengauz; Eyal Schiff; Shlomit Rienstein
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  From contemplation to classification of chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Igor N Lebedev; Daria I Zhigalina
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Somatic genome variations in health and disease.

Authors:  I Y Iourov; S G Vorsanova; Y B Yurov
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.236

Review 6.  Chromosomal instability in mammalian pre-implantation embryos: potential causes, detection methods, and clinical consequences.

Authors:  Brittany L Daughtry; Shawn L Chavez
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 5.249

7.  Quantitative decision-making in preimplantation genetic (aneuploidy) screening (PGS).

Authors:  Michael C Summers; Andrew D Foland
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Ontogenetic variation of the human genome.

Authors:  Y B Yurov; S G Vorsanova; I Y Iourov
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.236

9.  Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-h protocol.

Authors:  D S Johnson; G Gemelos; J Baner; A Ryan; C Cinnioglu; M Banjevic; R Ross; M Alper; B Barrett; J Frederick; D Potter; B Behr; M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-01-24       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Single cell genomics of the brain: focus on neuronal diversity and neuropsychiatric diseases.

Authors:  Ivan Y Iourov; Svetlana G Vorsanova; Yuri B Yurov
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.