Literature DB >> 19701975

Tacrolimus dosage requirements in living donor liver transplant recipients with small-for-size grafts.

Fei Liu1, Ya Li, Xiang Lan, Yong-Gang Wei, Bo Li, Lv-Nan Yan, Tian-Fu Wen, Ji-Chun Zhao, Ming-Qing Xu, Wen-Tao Wang, Jia-Yin Yang.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the tacrolimus dosage requirements and blood concentrations in adult-to-adult right lobe living donor liver transplantation (AALDLT) recipients with small-for-size (SFS) grafts.
METHODS: During January 2007 and October 2008, a total of 54 cases of AALDLT with an observation period of 6 mo were enrolled in this study. The 54 patients were divided into two groups according to graft-recipient body weight ratio (GRBW): SFS grafts group (Group S, GRBW < 0.8%, n = 8) and non-SFS grafts group (Group N, GRBW > or = 0.8%, n = 46). Tacrolimus 12-hour blood levels and doses were recorded during weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 and months 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 in group S and group N. Meanwhile, acute rejection rates, liver and renal function test results, and the number of potentially interacting medications were determined at each interval in the two groups. A comparison of tacrolimus dosage requirements and blood levels were made weekly in the first month post-surgery, and monthly from months 2 to 6.
RESULTS: There were no differences in the demographic characteristics, acute rejection rates, liver and renal function test results, or the number of potentially interacting medications administered between the two groups. The tacrolimus dosage requirements in group S were significantly lower than group N at 2 wk (2.8 +/- 0.4 mg/d vs 3.6 +/- 0.7 mg/d, P = 0.006), 3 wk (2.9 +/- 0.7 mg/d vs 3.9 +/- 0.8 mg/d, P = 0.008), 4 wk (2.9 +/- 0.8 mg/d vs 3.9 +/- 1.0 mg/d, P = 0.023) and 2 mo (2.8 +/- 0.7 mg/d vs 3.8 +/- 1.1 mg/d, P = 0.033). Tacrolimus 12-h trough concentrations were similar between the two groups at all times except for 2 wk post-transplantation, when the concentrations were significantly greater in group S recipients than in group N recipients (11.3 +/- 4.8 ng/mL vs 7.0 +/- 3.8 ng/mL, P = 0.026).
CONCLUSION: SFS grafts recipients have significantly decreased tacrolimus dosage requirements compared with non-SFS grafts recipients in AALDLT during the first 2 mo post-surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19701975      PMCID: PMC2731257          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.15.3931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  28 in total

1.  The interrelationship between portal and arterial blood flow after adult to adult living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  A Marcos; A T Olzinski; J M Ham; R A Fisher; M P Posner
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-12-27       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Effect of felodipine on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in a renal transplant recipient.

Authors:  Lavjay Butani; Gerre Berg; Sudesh P Makker
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Tacrolimus dosing requirements and concentrations in adult living donor liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  David J Taber; Robert E Dupuis; Amy L Fann; Kenneth A Andreoni; David A Gerber; Jeffrey H Fair; Mark W Johnson; Roshan Shrestha
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.799

4.  Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in adult recipients receiving living-donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  S Fukatsu; I Yano; T Igarashi; T Hashida; K Takayanagi; H Saito; S Uemoto; T Kiuchi; K Tanaka; K Inui; K Tanaka; K Inui
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Liver regeneration and function in donor and recipient after right lobe adult to adult living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  A Marcos; R A Fisher; J M Ham; M L Shiffman; A J Sanyal; V A Luketic; R K Sterling; A S Fulcher; M P Posner
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Correlation between optimal tacrolimus doses and the graft weight in living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Y Sugawara; M Makuuchi; J Kaneko; T Ohkubo; H Imamura; H Kawarasaki
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.863

7.  Hemodynamic interaction between portal vein and hepatic artery flow in small-for-size split liver transplantation.

Authors:  Vassilios Smyrniotis; Georgia Kostopanagiotou; Agathi Kondi; Evangelos Gamaletsos; Kassiani Theodoraki; Dimitrios Kehagias; Kyriaki Mystakidou; John Contis
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2002-06-12       Impact factor: 3.782

8.  Liver regeneration and surgical outcome in donors of right-lobe liver grafts.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Pomfret; James J Pomposelli; Fredric D Gordon; Nazli Erbay; Lori Lyn Price; W David Lewis; Roger L Jenkins
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Hepatocyte growth factor and transforming growth factor beta1 contribute to regeneration of small-for-size liver graft immediately after transplantation.

Authors:  Mizuki Ninomiya; Noboru Harada; Satoko Shiotani; Shoji Hiroshige; Ryosuke Minagawa; Yuji Soejima; Taketoshi Suehiro; Takashi Nishizaki; Mitsuo Shimada; Keizo Sugimachi
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 3.782

10.  Impact of intestinal CYP2C19 genotypes on the interaction between tacrolimus and omeprazole, but not lansoprazole, in adult living-donor liver transplant patients.

Authors:  Keiko Hosohata; Satohiro Masuda; Toshiya Katsura; Yasutsugu Takada; Toshimi Kaido; Yasuhiro Ogura; Fumitaka Oike; Hiroto Egawa; Shinji Uemoto; Ken-ichi Inui
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 3.922

View more
  2 in total

1.  A single centre prospective study of liver function tests in post liver transplant patients.

Authors:  Pradeep Naik; Venkataraman Sritharan; Premsagar Bandi; Mallikarjuna Madhavarapu
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-08-17

2.  Salvage liver transplantation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma within UCSF criteria after liver resection.

Authors:  Fei Liu; Yonggang Wei; Wentao Wang; Kefei Chen; Lvnan Yan; Tianfu Wen; Jichun Zhao; Mingqing Xu; Bo Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.