Literature DB >> 15001675

Tumor localization of 16beta-18F-fluoro-5alpha-dihydrotestosterone versus 18F-FDG in patients with progressive, metastatic prostate cancer.

Steven M Larson1, Michael Morris, Ilonka Gunther, Brad Beattie, John L Humm, Timothy A Akhurst, Ronald D Finn, Yusuf Erdi, Keith Pentlow, Jon Dyke, Olivia Squire, William Bornmann, Timothy McCarthy, Michael Welch, Howard Scher.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This trial was an initial assessment of the feasibility, in vivo targeting, and biokinetics of 16beta-(18)F-fluoro-5alpha-dihydrotestosterone ((18)F-FDHT) PET in patients with metastatic prostate cancer to assess androgen receptor expression.
METHODS: Seven patients with progressive clinically metastatic prostate cancer underwent (18)F-FDG and (18)F-FDHT PET scans in addition to conventional imaging methods. Three patients had their studies repeated 1 mo later, 2 while on testosterone therapy, and the third after treatment with 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG). High-pressure liquid radiochromatography was used to separate (18)F-FDHT from radiolabeled metabolites. Lesion-by-lesion comparisons between the (18)F-FDHT, (18)F-FDG, and conventional imaging methods were performed.
RESULTS: Metabolism of (18)F-FDHT was rapid, with 80% conversion within 10 min to radiolabeled metabolites that circulated bound to plasma proteins. Tumor uptake was rapid and tumor retention was prolonged. Fifty-nine lesions were identified by conventional imaging methods. (18)F-FDG PET was positive in 57 of 59 lesions (97%), with an average lesion maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) = 5.22. (18)F-FDHT PET was positive in 46 of 59 lesions (78%), with the average positive lesion SUV(max) = 5.28. Treatment with testosterone resulted in diminished (18)F-FDHT uptake at the tumor site.
CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDHT localizes to tumor sites in patients with progressive clinically metastatic prostate cancer and may be a promising agent to analyze antigen receptors and their impact on the clinical management of prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15001675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  102 in total

Review 1.  Non-FDG PET in oncology.

Authors:  R Núñez Miller; M A Pozo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 2.  GCPII imaging and cancer.

Authors:  C A Foss; R C Mease; S Y Cho; H J Kim; M G Pomper
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  [Molecular imaging with new PET tracers].

Authors:  A J Beer; M Schwaiger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  [Focus on molecular imaging in prostate cancer].

Authors:  L Michaud; K A Touijer
Journal:  Prog Urol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 0.915

5.  An imaging agent to detect androgen receptor and its active splice variants in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yusuke Imamura; Amy H Tien; Jinhe Pan; Jacky K Leung; Carmen A Banuelos; Kunzhong Jian; Jun Wang; Nasrin R Mawji; Javier Garcia Fernandez; Kuo-Shyan Lin; Raymond J Andersen; Marianne D Sadar
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2016-07-21

Review 6.  Novel tracers and their development for the imaging of metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrea B Apolo; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Michael J Morris
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  New horizons in prostate cancer imaging.

Authors:  Gregory Ravizzini; Baris Turkbey; Karen Kurdziel; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Antilipolytic drug boosts glucose metabolism in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kim Francis Andersen; Vadim Divilov; Jacek Koziorowski; NagaVaraKishore Pillarsetty; Jason S Lewis
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.408

9.  Pharmacokinetic assessment of the uptake of 16beta-18F-fluoro-5alpha-dihydrotestosterone (FDHT) in prostate tumors as measured by PET.

Authors:  Bradley J Beattie; Peter M Smith-Jones; Yuliya S Jhanwar; Heiko Schöder; C Ross Schmidtlein; Michael J Morris; Pat Zanzonico; Olivia Squire; Gustavo S P Meirelles; Ron Finn; Mohammad Namavari; Shangde Cai; Howard I Scher; Steven M Larson; John L Humm
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 10.  Functional imaging for prostate cancer: therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Carina Mari Aparici; Youngho Seo
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.446

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.