Literature DB >> 15000628

Dosimetric characterization of a large area pixel-segmented ionization chamber.

S Amerio1, A Boriano, F Bourhaleb, R Cirio, M Donetti, A Fidanzio, E Garelli, S Giordanengo, E Madon, F Marchetto, U Nastasi, C Peroni, A Piermattei, C J Sanz Freire, A Sardo, E Trevisiol.   

Abstract

A pixel-segmented ionization chamber has been designed and built by Torino University and INFN. The detector features a 24 x 24 cm2 active area divided in 1024 independent cylindrical ionization chambers and can be read out in 500 micros without introducing dead time; the digital charge quantum can be adjusted between 100 fC and 800 fC. The sensitive volume of each single ionization chamber is 0.07 cm3. The purpose of the detector is to ease the two-dimensional (2D) verifications of fields with complex shapes and large gradients. The detector was characterized in a PMMA phantom using 60Co and 6 MV x-ray photon beams. It has shown good signal linearity with respect to dose and dose rate to water. The average sensitivity of a single ionization chamber was 2.1 nC/Gy, constant within 0.5% over one month of daily measurements. Charge collection efficiency was 0.985 at the operating polarization voltage of 400 V and 3.5 Gy/min dose rate. Tissue maximum ratio and output factor have been compared with a Farmer ionization chamber and were found in good agreement. The dose profiles have been compared with the ones obtained with an ionization chamber in water phantom for the field sizes supplied by a 3D-Line dynamic multileaf collimator. These results show that this detector can be used for 2D dosimetry of x-ray photon beams, supplying a good spatial resolution and sensibly reducing the time spent in dosimetric verification of complex radiation fields.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15000628     DOI: 10.1118/1.1639992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  10 in total

1.  Two years experience with quality assurance protocol for patient related Rapid Arc treatment plan verification using a two dimensional ionization chamber array.

Authors:  Daniela Wagner; Hilke Vorwerk
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.481

2.  Relative dosimetrical verification in high dose rate brachytherapy using two-dimensional detector array IMatriXX.

Authors:  A Manikandan; Sarkar Biplab; Perianayagam A David; R Holla; T R Vivek; N Sujatha
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2011-07

3.  Feasibility of using two-dimensional array dosimeter for in vivo dose reconstruction via transit dosimetry.

Authors:  Heeteak Chung; Jonathan Li; Sanjiv Samant
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Portal dosimetry for pretreatment verification of IMRT plan: a comparison with 2D ion chamber array.

Authors:  Dayananda Shamurailatpam Sharma; Vaibav Mhatre; Malhotra Heigrujam; Kaustav Talapatra; Suman Mallik
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Sensitivity of array detector measurements in determining shifts of MLC leaf positions.

Authors:  Qingyang Shang; Andrew Godley; Long Huang; Peng Qi; Ping Xia
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Electronic Portal Imaging Device-Based Three-Dimensional Volumetric Dosimetry for Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy Pretreatment Quality Assurance.

Authors:  Manikandan Arjunan; Sureka Chandra Sekaran; Biplab Sarkar; Saran Kumar Manavalan
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

7.  Simple Electronic Portal Imager-Based Pretreatment Quality Assurance using Acuros XB: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Arjunan Manikandan; Sureka Chandra Sekaran; Biplab Sarkar; Sujatha Manikandan
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2019-12-11

8.  Angular dependence correction of MatriXX and its application to composite dose verification.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Shimohigashi; Fujio Araki; Hirofumi Tominaga; Junichi Sakata; Keiichi Kawasaki; Nagisa Kanetake; Yuki Iwashita; Saori Yoshimura; Tamami Kawakami; Terunobu Ishihara; Tomoko Okuda; Kasei Kogo
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Comparison of measured and computed portal dose for IMRT treatment.

Authors:  Savino Cilla; Pietro Viola; Luigi Azario; Luca Grimaldi; Maurizio Craus; Guido D'Onofrio; Andrea Fidanzio; Alessio Giuseppe Morganti; Angelo Piermattei
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Beam perturbation characteristics of a 2D transmission silicon diode array, Magic Plate.

Authors:  Ziyad A Alrowaili; Michael L F Lerch; Marco Petasecca; Martin G Carolan; Peter E Metcalfe; Anatoly B Rosenfeld
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.