Literature DB >> 14998703

The contribution of executive processes to deceptive responding.

Ray Johnson1, Jack Barnhardt, John Zhu.   

Abstract

We measured behavioral responses (RT) and recorded event-related brain potentials (ERPs) when participants made truthful and deceptive responses about perceived and remembered stimuli. Participants performed an old/new recognition test under three instructional conditions: Consistent Truthful, Consistent Deceptive and Random Deceptive. Compared to Consistent Truthful responses, Consistent Deceptive responses to both perceived and remembered stimuli produced the same pattern of less accurate, slower and more variable responses and larger medial frontal negativities (MFN). The MFN is thought to reflect activity in anterior cingulate cortex, a brain area involved in monitoring actions and resolving conflicting response tendencies. The Random Deceptive condition required participants to strategically monitor their long-term response patterns to accommodate a deceptive strategy. Even compared to the Consistent Deceptive condition, RTs in the Random Deceptive condition were significantly slower and more variable and MFN activity increased significantly. MFN scalp distribution results revealed the presence of three different patterns of brain activity; one each for truthful responses, deceptive responses and strategic monitoring. Thus, the data indicate that anterior cingulate cortex plays a key role in making deceptive responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14998703     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  36 in total

1.  The contributions of prefrontal cortex and executive control to deception: evidence from activation likelihood estimate meta-analyses.

Authors:  Shawn E Christ; David C Van Essen; Jason M Watson; Lindsay E Brubaker; Kathleen B McDermott
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-11-02       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Using fMRI to decode true thoughts independent of intention to conceal.

Authors:  Zhi Yang; Zirui Huang; Javier Gonzalez-Castillo; Rui Dai; Georg Northoff; Peter Bandettini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  The dishonest mind set in sequence.

Authors:  Anna Foerster; Robert Wirth; Wilfried Kunde; Roland Pfister
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-06-15

4.  A new account of the effect of probability on task switching: ERP evidence following the manipulation of switch probability, cue informativeness and predictability.

Authors:  Doreen Nessler; David Friedman; Ray Johnson
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Electrophysiological markers of working memory usage as an index for truth-based lies.

Authors:  Yu-Hui Lo; Philip Tseng
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Event-related potential measures of the intending process: time course and related ERP components.

Authors:  Guangheng Dong; Yanbo Hu; Hui Zhou
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 3.759

7.  The presentation order of cue and target matters in deception study.

Authors:  Guangheng Dong; Yanbo Hu; Qilin Lu; Haiyan Wu
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.759

8.  Wait, what? Assessing stereotype incongruities using the N400 ERP component.

Authors:  Katherine R White; Stephen L Crites; Jennifer H Taylor; Guadalupe Corral
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Neural correlates of spontaneous deception: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)study.

Authors:  Xiao Pan Ding; Xiaoqing Gao; Genyue Fu; Kang Lee
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Development of and change in cognitive control: a comparison of children, young adults, and older adults.

Authors:  David Friedman; Doreen Nessler; Yael M Cycowicz; Cort Horton
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.