Literature DB >> 14992508

Investigating implicit knowledge in ontologies with application to the anatomical domain.

S Zhang1, O Bodenreider.   

Abstract

Knowledge in biomedical ontologies can be explicitly represented (often by means of semantic relations), but may also be implicit, i.e., embedded in the concept names and inferable from various combinations of semantic relations. This paper investigates implicit knowledge in two ontologies of anatomy: the Foundational Model of Anatomy and GALEN. The methods consist of extracting the knowledge explicitly represented, acquiring the implicit knowledge through augmentation and inference techniques, and identifying the origin of each semantic relation. The number of relations (12 million in FMA and 4.6 million in GALEN), broken down by source, is presented. Major findings include: each technique provides specific relations; and many relations can be generated by more than one technique. The application of these findings to ontology auditing, validation, and maintenance is discussed, as well as the application to ontology integration.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14992508      PMCID: PMC4351965          DOI: 10.1142/9789812704856_0024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput        ISSN: 2335-6928


  6 in total

1.  GALEN's model of parts and wholes: experience and comparisons.

Authors:  J Rogers; A Rector
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

2.  Circular hierarchical relationships in the UMLS: etiology, diagnosis, treatment, complications and prevention.

Authors:  O Bodenreider
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

3.  Bidirectional mereological reasoning in anatomical knowledge bases.

Authors:  S Schulz
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

4.  Aligning representations of anatomy using lexical and structural methods.

Authors:  Songmao Zhang; Olivier Bodenreider
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

5.  Motivation and organizational principles for anatomical knowledge representation: the digital anatomist symbolic knowledge base.

Authors:  C Rosse; J L Mejino; B R Modayur; R Jakobovits; K P Hinshaw; J F Brinkley
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  The GRAIL concept modelling language for medical terminology.

Authors:  A L Rector; S Bechhofer; C A Goble; I Horrocks; W A Nowlan; W D Solomon
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.326

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Law and order: assessing and enforcing compliance with ontological modeling principles in the Foundational Model of Anatomy.

Authors:  Songmao Zhang; Olivier Bodenreider
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 4.589

2.  Experience in Aligning Anatomical Ontologies.

Authors:  Songmao Zhang; Olivier Bodenreider
Journal:  Int J Semant Web Inf Syst       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 0.843

3.  Relationship auditing of the FMA ontology.

Authors:  Huanying Helen Gu; Duo Wei; Jose L V Mejino; Gai Elhanan
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  A method for exploring implicit concept relatedness in biomedical knowledge network.

Authors:  Tian Bai; Leiguang Gong; Ye Wang; Yan Wang; Casimir A Kulikowski; Lan Huang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.