Literature DB >> 30405977

A New Method for Diaphragmatic Maximum Relaxation Rate Ultrasonographic Measurement in the Assessment of Patients With Diaphragmatic Dysfunction.

Christos P Loizou1, Dimitrios Matamis2, Giorgos Minas3, Theodoros Kyprianou3, Christakis D Loizou4, Eleni Soilemezi2, Entela Kotco2, Constantinos S Pattichis5.   

Abstract

Measurements of ultrasound diaphragmatic motion, amplitude, force, and velocity of contraction may provide important and essential information about diaphragmatic fatigue, weakness, or paralysis. In this paper, we propose and evaluate a semi-automated analysis system for measuring the diaphragmatic motion and estimating the maximum relaxation rate (MRR_SAUS) from ultrasound M-mode images of the diaphragmatic muscle. The system was evaluated on 27 M-mode ultrasound images of the diaphragmatic muscle [20 with no resistance (NRES) and 7 with resistance (RES)]. We computed semi-automated ultrasound MRR measurements on all NRES/RES images, using the proposed system (MRR_SAUS = 3.94 ± 0.91/4.98 ± 1.98 [1/s]), and compared them with the manual measurements made by a clinical expert (MRR_MUS = 2.36 ± 1.19/5.8 ± 2.1 [1/s],) and those made by a reference manual method (MRR_MB = 3.93 ± 0.89/3.73 ± 0.52 [1/sec], performed manually with the Biopac system. MRR_SAUS and MRR_MB measurements were not statistically significantly different for NRES and RES subjects but were significantly different with the MRR-MUS measurements made by the clinical expert. It is anticipated that the proposed system might be used in the future in the clinical practice in the assessment and follow up of patients with diaphragmatic weakness or paralysis. It may thus potentially help to understand post-operative pulmonary dysfunction or weaning failure from mechanical ventilation. Further validation and additional experimentation in a larger sample of images and different patient groups is required for further validating the proposed system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diaphragmatic muscle; diaphragmatic motion analysis; diaphragmatic ultrasound; maximum relaxation rate (MRR)

Year:  2018        PMID: 30405977      PMCID: PMC6204329          DOI: 10.1109/JTEHM.2018.2868671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med        ISSN: 2168-2372            Impact factor:   3.316


  25 in total

1.  Diaphragm ultrasonography to estimate the work of breathing during non-invasive ventilation.

Authors:  Emmanuel Vivier; Armand Mekontso Dessap; Saoussen Dimassi; Frederic Vargas; Aissam Lyazidi; Arnaud W Thille; Laurent Brochard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Comparative evaluation of despeckle filtering in ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery.

Authors:  Christos P Loizou; Constantinos S Pattichis; Christodoulos I Christodoulou; Robert S H Istepanian; Marios Pantziaris; Andrew Nicolaides
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Snakes based segmentation of the common carotid artery intima media.

Authors:  C P Loizou; C S Pattichis; M Pantziaris; T Tyllis; A Nicolaides
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Diaphragm ultrasound as a predictor of successful extubation from mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Ernest DiNino; Eric J Gartman; Jigme M Sethi; F Dennis McCool
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  Diaphragm breathing movement measurement using ultrasound and radiographic imaging: a concurrent validity.

Authors:  Dong K Noh; Jae J Lee; Joshua H You
Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.300

6.  Sonographic assessment of changes in diaphragmatic kinetics induced by inspiratory resistive loading.

Authors:  Eleni Soilemezi; Matthew Tsagourias; Michael A Talias; Elpidoforos S Soteriades; Vasilios Makrakis; Epaminondas Zakynthinos; Dimitrios Matamis
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 6.424

7.  Ultrasonographic evaluation of diaphragmatic motion.

Authors:  E O Gerscovich; M Cronan; J P McGahan; K Jain; C D Jones; C McDonald
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Diaphragm dysfunction assessed by ultrasonography: influence on weaning from mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Won Young Kim; Hee Jung Suh; Sang-Bum Hong; Younsuck Koh; Chae-Man Lim
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Maximum relaxation rate of the diaphragm during weaning from mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  J C Goldstone; M Green; J Moxham
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.139

10.  Diaphragmatic motion studied by m-mode ultrasonography: methods, reproducibility, and normal values.

Authors:  Alain Boussuges; Yoann Gole; Philippe Blanc
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 9.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.