Literature DB >> 14985506

Local feature frequency profile: a method to measure structural similarity in proteins.

In-Geol Choi1, Jaimyoung Kwon, Sung-Hou Kim.   

Abstract

Measures of structural similarity between known protein structures provide an objective basis for classifying protein folds and for revealing a global view of the protein structure universe. Here, we describe a rapid method to measure structural similarity based on the profiles of representative local features of C(alpha) distance matrices of compared protein structures. We first extract a finite number of representative local feature (LF) patterns from the distance matrices of all protein fold families by medoid analysis. Then, each C(alpha) distance matrix of a protein structure is encoded by labeling all its submatrices by the index of the nearest representative LF patterns. Finally, the structure is represented by the frequency distribution of these indices, which we call the LF frequency (LFF) profile of the protein. The LFF profile allows one to calculate structural similarity scores among a large number of protein structures quickly, and also to construct and update the "map" of the protein structure universe easily. The LFF profile method efficiently maps complex protein structures into a common Euclidean space without prior assignment of secondary structure information or structural alignment.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14985506      PMCID: PMC374324          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0308656100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  19 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Protein fold similarity estimated by a probabilistic approach based on C(alpha)-C(alpha) distance comparison.

Authors:  Oliviero Carugo; Sándor Pongor
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-01-25       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  ASTRAL compendium enhancements.

Authors:  John-Marc Chandonia; Nigel S Walker; Loredana Lo Conte; Patrice Koehl; Michael Levitt; Steven E Brenner
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Structural genomics. Tapping DNA for structures produces a trickle.

Authors:  Robert F Service
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path.

Authors:  I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1998-09

6.  SSAP: sequential structure alignment program for protein structure comparison.

Authors:  C A Orengo; W R Taylor
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.600

7.  Recovery of protein structure from contact maps.

Authors:  M Vendruscolo; E Kussell; E Domany
Journal:  Fold Des       Date:  1997

8.  Protein fold recognition and dynamics in the space of contact maps.

Authors:  L Mirny; E Domany
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1996-12

9.  CATH--a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures.

Authors:  C A Orengo; A D Michie; S Jones; D T Jones; M B Swindells; J M Thornton
Journal:  Structure       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  The FSSP database: fold classification based on structure-structure alignment of proteins.

Authors:  L Holm; C Sander
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  30 in total

1.  Comprehensive evaluation of protein structure alignment methods: scoring by geometric measures.

Authors:  Rachel Kolodny; Patrice Koehl; Michael Levitt
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-01-16       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  GOSSIP: a method for fast and accurate global alignment of protein structures.

Authors:  I Kifer; R Nussinov; H J Wolfson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Fast geometric consensus approach for protein model quality assessment.

Authors:  Rafal Adamczak; Jaroslaw Pillardy; Brinda K Vallat; Jaroslaw Meller
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 1.479

4.  FragBag, an accurate representation of protein structure, retrieves structural neighbors from the entire PDB quickly and accurately.

Authors:  Inbal Budowski-Tal; Yuval Nov; Rachel Kolodny
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Mining tertiary structural motifs for assessment of designability.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Gevorg Grigoryan
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.600

6.  Alignment-free local structural search by writhe decomposition.

Authors:  Degui Zhi; Maxim Shatsky; Steven E Brenner
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  FRASS: the web-server for RNA structural comparison.

Authors:  Svetlana Kirillova; Silvio C E Tosatto; Oliviero Carugo
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Distance matrix-based approach to protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Andrzej Kloczkowski; Robert L Jernigan; Zhijun Wu; Guang Song; Lei Yang; Andrzej Kolinski; Piotr Pokarowski
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2009-02-18

9.  Universal partitioning of the hierarchical fold network of 50-residue segments in proteins.

Authors:  Jun-ichi Ito; Yuki Sonobe; Kazuyoshi Ikeda; Kentaro Tomii; Junichi Higo
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2009-05-20

10.  FISim: a new similarity measure between transcription factor binding sites based on the fuzzy integral.

Authors:  Fernando Garcia; Francisco J Lopez; Carlos Cano; Armando Blanco
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.