Literature DB >> 11779819

Heterosis, marker mutational processes and population inbreeding history.

A Tsitrone1, F Rousset, P David.   

Abstract

Genotype-fitness correlations (GFC) have previously been studied using allozyme markers and have often focused on short-term processes such as recent inbreeding. Thus, models of GFC usually neglect marker mutation and only use heterozygosity as a genotypic index. Recently, GFC have also been reported (i) with DNA markers such as microsatellites, characterized by high mutation rates and specific mutational processes and (ii) using new individual genotypic indices assumed to be more precise than heterozygosity. The aim of this article is to evaluate the theoretical impact of marker mutation on GFC. We model GFC due to short-term processes generated by the current breeding system (partial selfing) and to long-term processes generated by past population history (hybridization). Various mutation rates and mutation models corresponding to different kinds of molecular markers are considered. Heterozygosity is compared to other genotypic indices designed for specific marker types. Highly mutable markers (such as microsatellites) are particularly suitable for the detection of GFC that evolve in relation to short-term processes, whereas GFC due to long-term processes are best observed with intermediate mutation rates. Irrespective of the marker type and population scenario, heterozygosity usually provides higher correlations than other genotypic indices under most biologically plausible conditions.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11779819      PMCID: PMC1461896     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  22 in total

1.  Usefulness of single nucleotide polymorphism data for estimating population parameters.

Authors:  M K Kuhner; P Beerli; J Yamato; J Felsenstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  THE NUMBER OF ALLELES THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED IN A FINITE POPULATION.

Authors:  M KIMURA; J F CROW
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1964-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  AN ESTIMATE OF THE MUTATIONAL DAMAGE IN MAN FROM DATA ON CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGES.

Authors:  N E Morton; J F Crow; H J Muller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1956-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Associative overdominance, heterozygosity and fitness.

Authors:  P Pamilo; S Pálsson
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Equilibrium values of measures of population subdivision for stepwise mutation processes.

Authors:  F Rousset
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: new perspectives on old problems.

Authors:  P David
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Correlations, descent measures: drift with migration and mutation.

Authors:  C C Cockerham; B S Weir
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Detrimental genes with partial selfing and effects on a neutral locus.

Authors:  T Ota; C C Cockerham
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Development of associative overdominance through linkage disequilibrium in finite populations.

Authors:  T Ohta; M Kimura
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1970-10-02       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Allele frequencies at microsatellite loci: the stepwise mutation model revisited.

Authors:  A M Valdes; M Slatkin; N B Freimer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  16 in total

1.  Adaptive genetic complementarity in mate choice coexists with selection for elaborate sexual traits.

Authors:  Kevin P Oh; Alexander V Badyaev
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Maternal heterozygosity and progeny fitness association in an inbred Scots pine population.

Authors:  S Abrahamsson; J Ahlinder; P Waldmann; M R García-Gil
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Sex-specific impact of inbreeding on pathogen load in the striped dolphin.

Authors:  Georgios A Gkafas; Menno de Jong; Athanasios Exadactylos; Juan Antonio Raga; Francisco J Aznar; A Rus Hoelzel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Genetic diversity and reproductive success in mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx).

Authors:  M Charpentier; J M Setchell; F Prugnolle; L A Knapp; E J Wickings; P Peignot; M Hossaert-McKey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Within- and among-population impact of genetic erosion on adult fitness-related traits in the European tree frog Hyla arborea.

Authors:  E Luquet; J-P Léna; P David; J Prunier; P Joly; T Lengagne; N Perrin; S Plénet
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Sexual selection and individual genetic diversity in a songbird.

Authors:  Rupert C Marshall; Katherine L Buchanan; Clive K Catchpole
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  The impact of genetic parental distance on developmental stability and fitness in Drosophila buzzatii.

Authors:  Ditte Holm Andersen; Cino Pertoldi; Volker Loeschcke; Sandro Cavicchi; Valerio Scali
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Song repertoire size varies with HVC volume and is indicative of male quality in song sparrows (Melospiza melodia).

Authors:  Jeremy A Pfaff; Liana Zanette; Scott A MacDougall-Shackleton; Elizabeth A MacDougall-Shackleton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Estimating genome-wide heterozygosity: effects of demographic history and marker type.

Authors:  J M Miller; R M Malenfant; P David; C S Davis; J Poissant; J T Hogg; M Festa-Bianchet; D W Coltman
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Does genetic diversity predict health in humans?

Authors:  Hanne C Lie; Leigh W Simmons; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.