Literature DB >> 18038194

Causal factors implicated in research misconduct: evidence from ORI case files.

Mark S Davis1, Michelle Riske-Morris, Sebastian R Diaz.   

Abstract

There has been relatively little empirical research into the causes of research misconduct. To begin to address this void, the authors collected data from closed case files of the Office of Research Integrity (ORI). These data were in the form of statements extracted from ORI file documents including transcripts, investigative reports, witness statements, and correspondence. Researchers assigned these statements to 44 different concepts. These concepts were then analyzed using multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis. The authors chose a solution consisting of seven clusters: (1) personal and professional stressors, (2) organizational climate, (3) job insecurities, (4) rationalizations A, (5) personal inhibitions, (6) rationalizations B and, (7) personality factors. The authors discuss the implications of their findings for policy and for future research.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18038194     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-007-9045-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  34 in total

1.  Fraud will out--or will it?

Authors:  June Price Tangney
Journal:  New Sci       Date:  1987-08-06       Impact factor: 0.319

2.  Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions.

Authors:  Mary Frank Fox; John M Braxton
Journal:  J Higher Educ       Date:  1994 May-Jun

3.  Scientific integrity.

Authors:  Marion E Broome
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.250

4.  The role of culture in research misconduct.

Authors:  Mark S Davis
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2003 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Scientific fraud: definitions, policies, and implications for nursing research.

Authors:  R M Chop; M C Silva
Journal:  J Prof Nurs       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  A preliminary investigation of ethical problems in publication and research.

Authors:  M Holaday; T E Yost
Journal:  J Soc Behav Pers       Date:  1995

7.  Doctor fabricated research while depressed.

Authors:  Owen Dyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-10-30

8.  Misconduct in science: does family medicine have a problem?

Authors:  A O Berg
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.756

9.  Publish wisely or perish: quality rather than quantity in medical writing.

Authors:  S W Fletcher; R H Fletcher
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singap       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.473

10.  Defining scientific misconduct. The relevance of mental state.

Authors:  R Dresser
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-02-17       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  31 in total

1.  The university and the responsible conduct of research: who is responsible for what?

Authors:  Katherine Alfredo; Hillary Hart
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 2.  Research misconduct and data fraud in clinical trials: prevalence and causal factors.

Authors:  Stephen L George
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Data fraud in clinical trials.

Authors:  Stephen L George; Marc Buyse
Journal:  Clin Investig (Lond)       Date:  2015

4.  Perceptions of Work-Related Stress and Ethical Misconduct Amongst Non-tenured Researchers in Italy.

Authors:  Oronzo Parlangeli; Stefano Guidi; Enrica Marchigiani; Margherita Bracci; Paul M Liston
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Ethics in 15 min per week.

Authors:  Ann M Peiffer; Christina E Hugenschmidt; Paul J Laurienti
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  In Their Own Words: Research Misconduct from the Perspective of Researchers in Malaysian Universities.

Authors:  Angelina P Olesen; Latifah Amin; Zurina Mahadi
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Individual and organizational predictors of the ethicality of graduate students' responses to research integrity issues.

Authors:  Philip J Langlais; Blake J Bent
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Research coordinators' experiences with scientific misconduct and research integrity.

Authors:  Barbara Habermann; Marion Broome; Erica R Pryor; Kim Wagler Ziner
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Environmental Factors Contributing to Wrongdoing in Medicine: A Criterion-Based Review of Studies and Cases.

Authors:  James M Dubois; Kelly Carroll; Tyler Gibb; Elena Kraus; Timothy Rubbelke; Meghan Vasher; Emily E Anderson
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2011-11-29

10.  Do pressures to publish increase scientists' bias? An empirical support from US States Data.

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.