Literature DB >> 14976537

Simultaneous chromosome 1q gain and 16q loss is associated with steroid receptor presence and low proliferation in breast carcinoma.

Fulvia Farabegoli1, Mario A J A Hermsen, Claudio Ceccarelli, Donatella Santini, Marianne M Weiss, Gerrit A Meijer, Paul J van Diest.   

Abstract

We applied comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to 46 breast carcinoma samples, collected from 1993 to 1995, in order to detect chromosome 1q gains and 16q losses and to define whether samples showing both these alterations had distinct biopathologic features and different clinical outcome. A total of 22 samples (48%) had simultaneous chromosome 1q gain and 16q loss, which was always associated with other genetic changes. In total, 23 samples had various chromosome imbalances (including chromosome 1q gain independent of chromosome 16q loss and vice versa) and one sample did not show detectable alterations. Samples having chromosome 1q gain/16q loss were compared to the other samples with regard to neoplasm size, lymph-node status, histologic and nuclear grade, estrogen and progesterone receptor presence, Ki-67, pRB, Cyclin D1, Cyclin A, p53, p21 and p27 expression as detected by immunohistochemistry. The samples showing chromosome 1q gain/16q loss had high steroid hormone receptor expression (P=0.02), low cell growth fraction (Ki-67, P=0.03) and high p27 expression (P<0.001). No statistical correlation with disease-free survival and overall survival or response to hormonal therapy was found. We conclude that simultaneous chromosome 1q gain/16q loss is a frequent event in invasive breast cancer, which occurs in a subset of both intermediate- and high-grade breast carcinomas. Although the final chromosome 1q and 16q imbalances might have originated from different chromosome alterations in low- and high-grade samples, the gene-dosage effect might be important in conferring peculiar biopathologic characteristics to this subset of samples. The cytogenetic and molecular mechanisms underlying these chromosome changes deserve further investigations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14976537     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  11 in total

1.  Genomic architecture characterizes tumor progression paths and fate in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Hege G Russnes; Hans Kristian Moen Vollan; Ole Christian Lingjærde; Alexander Krasnitz; Pär Lundin; Bjørn Naume; Therese Sørlie; Elin Borgen; Inga H Rye; Anita Langerød; Suet-Feung Chin; Andrew E Teschendorff; Philip J Stephens; Susanne Månér; Ellen Schlichting; Lars O Baumbusch; Rolf Kåresen; Michael P Stratton; Michael Wigler; Carlos Caldas; Anders Zetterberg; James Hicks; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  8p deletion is strongly linked to poor prognosis in breast cancer.

Authors:  P Lebok; A Mittenzwei; M Kluth; C Özden; B Taskin; K Hussein; K Möller; A Hartmann; A Lebeau; I Witzel; S Mahner; L Wölber; F Jänicke; S Geist; P Paluchowski; C Wilke; U Heilenkötter; R Simon; G Sauter; L Terracciano; R Krech; A von der Assen; V Müller; E Burandt
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 4.742

3.  Chromosome 6p Amplification in Aqueous Humor Cell-Free DNA Is a Prognostic Biomarker for Retinoblastoma Ocular Survival.

Authors:  Liya Xu; Ashley Polski; Rishvanth K Prabakar; Mark W Reid; Patricia Chevez-Barrios; Rima Jubran; Jonathan W Kim; Peter Kuhn; David Cobrinik; James Hicks; Jesse L Berry
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 5.852

4.  Genomic differences between estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative human breast carcinoma identified by single nucleotide polymorphism array comparative genome hybridization analysis.

Authors:  Min Fang; Jessica Toher; Martin Morgan; Jerry Davison; Susan Tannenbaum; Kevin Claffey
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Chromosome 1q25.3 copy number alterations in primary breast cancers detected by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and allelic imbalance assays and its comparison with fluorescent in situ hybridization assays.

Authors:  Emilia Wiechec; Jens Overgaard; Eigil Kjeldsen; Lise Lotte Hansen
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 6.730

6.  BRCA1-mutated and basal-like breast cancers have similar aCGH profiles and a high incidence of protein truncating TP53 mutations.

Authors:  Henne Holstege; Hugo M Horlings; Arno Velds; Anita Langerød; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Marc J van de Vijver; Petra M Nederlof; Jos Jonkers
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridisation of breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  J-Y Pierga; J S Reis-Filho; S J Cleator; T Dexter; A Mackay; P Simpson; K Fenwick; M Iravani; J Salter; M Hills; C Jones; A Ashworth; I E Smith; T Powles; M Dowsett
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Integrative analysis of copy number and gene expression in breast cancer using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded core biopsy tissue: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Mahesh Iddawela; Oscar Rueda; Jenny Eremin; Oleg Eremin; Jed Cowley; Helena M Earl; Carlos Caldas
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Breast tumors with elevated expression of 1q candidate genes confer poor clinical outcome and sensitivity to Ras/PI3K inhibition.

Authors:  Muthulakshmi Muthuswami; Vignesh Ramesh; Saikat Banerjee; Soundara Viveka Thangaraj; Jayaprakash Periasamy; Divya Bhaskar Rao; Georgina D Barnabas; Swetha Raghavan; Kumaresan Ganesan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization reveals an association of chromosome 8q22 but not 8p21 imbalance with high grade invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Logan C Walker; Margaret McDonald; J Elisabeth Wells; Gavin C Harris; Bridget A Robinson; Christine M Morris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.