Literature DB >> 25961141

8p deletion is strongly linked to poor prognosis in breast cancer.

P Lebok1, A Mittenzwei, M Kluth, C Özden, B Taskin, K Hussein, K Möller, A Hartmann, A Lebeau, I Witzel, S Mahner, L Wölber, F Jänicke, S Geist, P Paluchowski, C Wilke, U Heilenkötter, R Simon, G Sauter, L Terracciano, R Krech, A von der Assen, V Müller, E Burandt.   

Abstract

Deletions of chromosome 8p occur frequently in breast cancers, but analyses of its clinical relevance have been limited to small patient cohorts and provided controversial results. A tissue microarray with 2,197 breast cancers was thus analyzed by fluorescence in-situ hybridization using an 8p21 probe in combination with a centromere 8 reference probe. 8p deletions were found in 50% of carcinomas with no special type, 67% of papillary, 28% of tubular, 37% of lobular cancers and 56% of cancers with medullary features. Deletions were always heterozygous. 8p deletion was significantly linked to advanced tumor stage (P < 0.0001), high-grade (P < 0.0001), high tumor cell proliferation (Ki67 Labeling Index; P < 0.0001), and shortened overall survival (P < 0.0001). For example, 8p deletion was seen in 32% of 290 grade 1, 43% of 438 grade 2, and 65% of 427 grade 3 cancers. In addition, 8p deletions were strongly linked to amplification of MYC (P < 0.0001), HER2 (P < 0.0001), and CCND1 (p = 0.001), but inversely associated with ER receptor expression (p = 0.0001). Remarkably, 46.5% of 8p-deleted cancers harbored amplification of at least one of the analyzed genes as compared to 27.5% amplifications in 8p-non-deleted cancers (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, 8p deletion characterizes a subset of particularly aggressive breast cancers. As 8p deletions are easy to analyze, this feature appears to be highly suited for future DNA based prognostic breast cancer panels. The strong link of 8p deletion with various gene amplifications raises the possibility of a role for regulating genomic stability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  8p; ER, estrogen receptor; FISH; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; Ki67LI, Ki67 Labeling index; LOH, loss of heterozygosity; NGS, next generation sequencing; NST, no special type; PR, progesterone receptor; TMA, tissue microarray; breast cancer; deletion; pN, nodal stage; pT, pathological tumor stage; prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25961141      PMCID: PMC4623106          DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2015.1046025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther        ISSN: 1538-4047            Impact factor:   4.742


  73 in total

1.  Economic analysis of targeting chemotherapy using a 21-gene RT-PCR assay in lymph-node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  John Hornberger; Leon E Cosler; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Chromosome 8p alterations in sporadic and BRCA2 999del5 linked breast cancer.

Authors:  B I Sigbjörnsdottir; G Ragnarsson; B A Agnarsson; C Huiping; R B Barkardottir; V Egilsson; S Ingvarsson
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Genomic deletion of PTEN is associated with tumor progression and early PSA recurrence in ERG fusion-positive and fusion-negative prostate cancer.

Authors:  Antje Krohn; Tobias Diedler; Lia Burkhardt; Pascale-Sophie Mayer; Colin De Silva; Marie Meyer-Kornblum; Darja Kötschau; Pierre Tennstedt; Joseph Huang; Clarissa Gerhäuser; Malte Mader; Stefan Kurtz; Hüseyin Sirma; Fred Saad; Thomas Steuber; Markus Graefen; Christoph Plass; Guido Sauter; Ronald Simon; Sarah Minner; Thorsten Schlomm
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Tissue microarrays for comparing molecular features with proliferation activity in breast cancer.

Authors:  Christian Ruiz; Silvia Seibt; Khawla Al Kuraya; Abdul K Siraj; Martina Mirlacher; Peter Schraml; Robert Maurer; Hanspeter Spichtin; Joachim Torhorst; Savelina Popovska; Ronald Simon; Guido Sauter
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Prognostic relevance of AIB1 (NCoA3) amplification and overexpression in breast cancer.

Authors:  E Burandt; G Jens; F Holst; F Jänicke; V Müller; A Quaas; M Choschzick; W Wilczak; L Terracciano; R Simon; G Sauter; A Lebeau
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Clinical significance of different types of p53 gene alteration in surgically treated prostate cancer.

Authors:  Martina Kluth; Silvia Harasimowicz; Lia Burkhardt; Katharina Grupp; Antje Krohn; Kristina Prien; Jovisa Gjoni; Thomas Haß; Rami Galal; Markus Graefen; Alexander Haese; Ronald Simon; Julia Hühne-Simon; Christina Koop; Jan Korbel; Joachim Weischenfeld; Hartwig Huland; Guido Sauter; Alexander Quaas; Waldemar Wilczak; Maria-Christina Tsourlakis; Sarah Minner; Thorsten Schlomm
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Karyotypic aberrations of chromosomes 16 and 17 are related to survival in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  R G Hislop; N Pratt; S C Stocks; C M Steel; M Sales; D Goudie; A Robertson; A M Thompson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast is associated with chromosome 8 abnormalities detected by comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Ann D Thor; Clarence Eng; Sandy Devries; Michael Paterakos; William G Watkin; Susan Edgerton; Dan H Moore; Joan Etzell; Frederic M Waldman
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 9.  Therapeutic potential of PARP inhibitors for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Sheeba Irshad; Alan Ashworth; Andrew Tutt
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.512

10.  Genome-wide analysis of loss of heterozygosity in breast infiltrating ductal carcinoma distant normal tissue highlights arm specific enrichment and expansion across tumor stages.

Authors:  Xiaoyang Ruan; Hongfang Liu; Lisa Boardman; Jean-Pierre A Kocher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Important molecular genetic markers of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Anna V Kudryavtseva; Anastasia V Lipatova; Andrew R Zaretsky; Alexey A Moskalev; Maria S Fedorova; Anastasiya S Rasskazova; Galina A Shibukhova; Anastasiya V Snezhkina; Andrey D Kaprin; Boris Y Alekseev; Alexey A Dmitriev; George S Krasnov
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-16

2.  PIK3CA mutations are common in lobular carcinoma in situ, but are not a biomarker of progression.

Authors:  Vandna Shah; Salpie Nowinski; Dina Levi; Irek Shinomiya; Narda Kebaier Ep Chaabouni; Cheryl Gillett; Anita Grigoriadis; Trevor A Graham; Rebecca Roylance; Michael A Simpson; Sarah E Pinder; Elinor J Sawyer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 6.466

3.  Copy number changes at 8p11-12 predict adverse clinical outcome and chemo- and radiotherapy response in breast cancer.

Authors:  Cathy B Moelans; Caroline M G van Maldegem; Elsken van der Wall; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-03-30

4.  Up-regulation of lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 1 (LPCAT1) is linked to poor prognosis in breast cancer.

Authors:  Patrick Lebok; Aurelia von Hassel; Jan Meiners; Claudia Hube-Magg; Ronald Simon; Doris Höflmayer; Andrea Hinsch; David Dum; Christoph Fraune; Cosima Göbel; Katharina Möller; Guido Sauter; Frank Jacobsen; Franziska Büscheck; Kristina Prien; Till Krech; Rainer Horst Krech; Albert von der Assen; Linn Wölber; Isabell Witzel; Barbara Schmalfeldt; Stefan Geist; Peter Paluchoswski; Christian Wilke; Uwe Heilenkötter; Luigi Terracciano; Volkmar Müller; Waldemar Wilczak; Eike Christian Burandt
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.682

5.  Copy number alterations associated with clinical features in an underrepresented population with breast cancer.

Authors:  Raquel M Rodrigues-Peres; Benilton de S Carvalho; Meenakshi Anurag; Jonathan T Lei; Livia Conz; Rodrigo Gonçalves; Cássio Cardoso Filho; Susana Ramalho; Geisilene R de Paiva; Sophie F M Derchain; Iscia Lopes-Cendes; Matthew J Ellis; Luis O Sarian
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 2.183

6.  The Role of Csmd1 during Mammary Gland Development.

Authors:  Samuel J Burgess; Hannah Gibbs; Carmel Toomes; Patricia L Coletta; Sandra M Bell
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 4.096

7.  Single-cell analysis of copy-number alterations in serous ovarian cancer reveals substantial heterogeneity in both low- and high-grade tumors.

Authors:  Manonmani Kumar; Robert R Bowers; Joe R Delaney
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Identification of genomic copy number variations associated with specific clinical features of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Boris Zagradišnik; Danijela Krgović; Špela Stangler Herodež; Andreja Zagorac; Bogdan Ćižmarević; Nadja Kokalj Vokač
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Analysis of Copy-Number Variations and Feline Mammary Carcinoma Survival.

Authors:  Hugo Murua Escobar; Ingo Nolte; José Luis Granados-Soler; Kirsten Bornemann-Kolatzki; Julia Beck; Bertram Brenig; Ekkehard Schütz; Daniela Betz; Johannes Junginger; Marion Hewicker-Trautwein
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A meta-analysis of BRF2 as a prognostic biomarker in invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Stephanie Cabarcas-Petroski; Patricio I Meneses; Laura Schramm
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.