Literature DB >> 14971971

Comparison of Olympic vs. traditional power lifting training programs in football players.

Jay R Hoffman1, Joshua Cooper, Michael Wendell, Jie Kang.   

Abstract

Twenty members of an National Collegiate Athletic Association Division III collegiate football team were assigned to either an Olympic lifting (OL) group or power lifting (PL) group. Each group was matched by position and trained 4-days.wk(-1) for 15 weeks. Testing consisted of field tests to evaluate strength (1RM squat and bench press), 40-yard sprint, agility, vertical jump height (VJ), and vertical jump power (VJP). No significant pre- to posttraining differences were observed in 1RM bench press, 40-yard sprint, agility, VJ or in VJP in either group. Significant improvements were seen in 1RM squat in both the OL and PL groups. After log10-transformation, OL were observed to have a significantly greater improvement in Delta VJ than PL. Despite an 18% greater improvement in 1RM squat (p > 0.05), and a twofold greater improvement (p > 0.05) in 40-yard sprint time by OL, no further significant group differences were seen. Results suggest that OL can provide a significant advantage over PL in vertical jump performance changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14971971     DOI: 10.1519/1533-4287(2004)018<0129:coovtp>2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  19 in total

Review 1.  Understanding change of direction ability in sport: a review of resistance training studies.

Authors:  Matt Brughelli; John Cronin; Greg Levin; Anis Chaouachi
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Effects of protein supplementation on muscular performance and resting hormonal changes in college football players.

Authors:  Jay R Hoffman; Nicholas A Ratamess; Jie Kang; Michael J Falvo; Avery D Faigenbaum
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 3.  Unique aspects of competitive weightlifting: performance, training and physiology.

Authors:  Adam Storey; Heather K Smith
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  Weightlifting pulling derivatives: rationale for implementation and application.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Paul Comfort; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  The development, retention and decay rates of strength and power in elite rugby union, rugby league and American football: a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel Travis McMaster; Nicholas Gill; John Cronin; Michael McGuigan
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Increases in lower-body strength transfer positively to sprint performance: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laurent B Seitz; Alvaro Reyes; Tai T Tran; Eduardo Saez de Villarreal; G Gregory Haff
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 7.  A brief review of strength and ballistic assessment methodologies in sport.

Authors:  Daniel Travis McMaster; Nicholas Gill; John Cronin; Michael McGuigan
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Resistance training intensity and volume affect changes in rate of force development in resistance-trained men.

Authors:  Gerald T Mangine; Jay R Hoffman; Ran Wang; Adam M Gonzalez; Jeremy R Townsend; Adam J Wells; Adam R Jajtner; Kyle S Beyer; Carleigh H Boone; Amelia A Miramonti; Michael B LaMonica; David H Fukuda; Nicholas A Ratamess; Jeffrey R Stout
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Power-Time Curve Comparison between Weightlifting Derivatives.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Christopher J Sole
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 10.  The Importance of Muscular Strength: Training Considerations.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Sophia Nimphius; Christopher R Bellon; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.