Literature DB >> 23529287

The development, retention and decay rates of strength and power in elite rugby union, rugby league and American football: a systematic review.

Daniel Travis McMaster1, Nicholas Gill, John Cronin, Michael McGuigan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Strength and power are crucial components to excelling in all contact sports; and understanding how a player's strength and power levels fluctuate in response to various resistance training loads is of great interest, as it will inevitably dictate the loading parameters throughout a competitive season. This is a systematic review of training, maintenance and detraining studies, focusing on the development, retention and decay rates of strength and power measures in elite rugby union, rugby league and American football players. SEARCH STRATEGIES: A literature search using MEDLINE, EBSCO Host, Google Scholar, IngentaConnect, Ovid LWW, ProQuest Central, ScienceDirect Journals, SPORTDiscus and Wiley InterScience was conducted. References were also identified from other review articles and relevant textbooks. From 300 articles, 27 met the inclusion criteria and were retained for further analysis. STUDY QUALITY: Study quality was assessed via a modified 20-point scale created to evaluate research conducted in athletic-based training environments. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) quality rating of the included studies was 16.2 ± 1.9; the rating system revealed that the quality of future studies can be improved by randomly allocating subjects to training groups, providing greater description and detail of the interventions, and including control groups where possible. DATA ANALYSIS: Percent change, effect size (ES = [Post-Xmean - Pre-Xmean)/Pre-SD) calculations and SDs were used to assess the magnitude and spread of strength and power changes in the included studies. The studies were grouped according to (1) mean intensity relative volume (IRV = sets × repetitions × intensity; (2) weekly training frequency per muscle group; and (3) detraining duration. IRV is the product of the number of sets, repetitions and intensity performed during a training set and session. The effects of weekly training frequencies were assessed by normalizing the percent change values to represent the weekly changes in strength and power. During the IRV analysis, the percent change values were normalized to represent the percent change per training session. The long-term periodized training effects (12, 24 and 48 months) on strength and power were also investigated.
RESULTS: Across the 27 studies (n = 1,015), 234 percent change and 230 ES calculations were performed. IRVs of 11-30 (i.e., 3-6 sets of 4-10 repetitions at 74-88% one-repetition maximum [1RM]) elicited strength and power increases of 0.42% and 0.07% per training session, respectively. The following weekly strength changes were observed for two, three and four training sessions per muscle region/week: 0.9%, 1.8 % and 1.3 %, respectively. Similarly, the weekly power changes for two, three and four training sessions per muscle group/week were 0.1%, 0.3% and 0.7 %, respectively. Mean decreases of 14.5% (ES = -0.64) and 0.4 (ES = -0.10) were observed in strength and power across mean detraining periods of 7.2 ± 5.8 and 7.6 ± 5.1 weeks, respectively. The long-term training studies found strength increases of 7.1 ± 1.0% (ES = 0.55), 8.5 ± 3.3% (ES = 0.81) and 12.5 ± 6.8% (ES = 1.39) over 12, 24 and 48 months, respectively; they also found power increases of 14.6% (ES = 1.30) and 12.2% (ES = 1.06) at 24 and 48 months.
CONCLUSION: Based on current findings, training frequencies of two to four resistance training sessions per muscle group/week can be prescribed to develop upper and lower body strength and power. IRVs ranging from 11 to 30 (i.e., 3-6 sets of 4-10 repetitions of 70-88% 1RM) can be prescribed in a periodized manner to retain power and develop strength in the upper and lower body. Strength levels can be maintained for up to 3 weeks of detraining, but decay rates will increase thereafter (i.e. 5-16 weeks). The effect of explosive-ballistic training and detraining on pure power development and decay in elite rugby and American football players remain inconclusive. The long-term effects of periodized resistance training programmes on strength and power seem to follow the law of diminishing returns, as training exposure increases beyond 12-24 months, adaptation rates are reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23529287     DOI: 10.1007/s40279-013-0031-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  70 in total

1.  Strength changes during an in-season resistance-training program for football.

Authors:  Jay R Hoffman; Jie Kang
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  Training-induced changes in neural function.

Authors:  Per Aagaard
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.230

3.  Strong correlation of maximal squat strength with sprint performance and vertical jump height in elite soccer players.

Authors:  U Wisløff; C Castagna; J Helgerud; R Jones; J Hoff
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  Comparison of Olympic vs. traditional power lifting training programs in football players.

Authors:  Jay R Hoffman; Joshua Cooper; Michael Wendell; Jie Kang
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 5.  Applications of the dose-response for muscular strength development: a review of meta-analytic efficacy and reliability for designing training prescription.

Authors:  Mark D Peterson; Matthew R Rhea; Brent A Alvar
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Comparison between different off-season resistance training programs in Division III American college football players.

Authors:  Jay R Hoffman; Nicholas A Ratamess; Marc Klatt; Avery D Faigenbaum; Ryan E Ross; Nicholas M Tranchina; Robert C McCurley; Jie Kang; William J Kraemer
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  In-season resistance training and detraining in professional team handball players.

Authors:  Mário Cardoso Marques; Mário A Cardoso Marques; Juan José González-Badillo
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Effects of a short-term pre-season training programme on the body composition and anaerobic performance of professional rugby union players.

Authors:  Christos K Argus; Nicholas Gill; Justin Keogh; Will G Hopkins; C Martyn Beaven
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.337

Review 9.  Functional and clinical significance of skeletal muscle architecture.

Authors:  R L Lieber; J Fridén
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.217

10.  Power and power potentiation among strength-power athletes: preliminary study.

Authors:  Michael H Stone; William A Sands; Kyle C Pierce; Michael W Ramsey; G Gregory Haff
Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.010

View more
  15 in total

1.  Seasonal strength performance and its relationship with training load on elite runners.

Authors:  Carlos Balsalobre-Fernández; Carlos M Tejero-González; Juan Del Campo-Vecino
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 2.  A brief review of strength and ballistic assessment methodologies in sport.

Authors:  Daniel Travis McMaster; Nicholas Gill; John Cronin; Michael McGuigan
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Applied sport science of rugby league.

Authors:  Rich D Johnston; Tim J Gabbett; David G Jenkins
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  The Impact of Statewide Limitations of Practice on High School Injury Incidence During the COVID-19 Season: An Ecological Study.

Authors:  Garrett Bullock; Albert Prats-Uribe; Charles A Thigpen; Lisa Boyer; Kate Varnado; Jason Pequette; Ellen Shanley
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.355

5.  The effect of phasic versus combined neuromuscular electrical stimulation using the StimaWELL 120MTRS system on multifidus muscle morphology and function in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Maryse Fortin; Daniel Wolfe; Geoffrey Dover; Mathieu Boily
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 6.  Monitoring Workload in Throwing-Dominant Sports: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Georgia M Black; Tim J Gabbett; Michael H Cole; Geraldine Naughton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 7.  Seasonal Changes in Strength and Power in Elite Rugby League: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kellyanne J Redman; Vincent G Kelly; Emma M Beckman
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.988

8.  In-season eccentric-overload training in elite soccer players: Effects on body composition, strength and sprint performance.

Authors:  Luis Suarez-Arrones; Eduardo Saez de Villarreal; Francisco Javier Núñez; Valter Di Salvo; Cristian Petri; Alessandro Buccolini; Rafael Angel Maldonado; Nacho Torreno; Alberto Mendez-Villanueva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Training of Short Distance Sprint Performance in Football Code Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ben Nicholson; Alex Dinsdale; Ben Jones; Kevin Till
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Acute attenuation of fatigue after sodium bicarbonate supplementation does not manifest into greater training adaptations after 10-weeks of resistance training exercise.

Authors:  Jason C Siegler; Paul W M Marshall; Harrison Finn; Rebecca Cross; Kurt Mudie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.