S Sipione1, A Eshpeter2, J G Lyon2, G S Korbutt2, R C Bleackley3. 1. Department of Biochemistry, 460 Medical Sciences Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2H7, Canada. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H7, Canada. 3. Department of Biochemistry, 460 Medical Sciences Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2H7, Canada. chris.bleackley@ualberta.ca.
Abstract
AIM/HYPOTHESIS: Embryonic stem (ES) cells have been proposed as a potential source of tissue for transplantation for the treatment of Type 1 diabetes. However, studies showing differentiation of beta cells from ES cells are controversial. The aim of this study was to characterise the insulin-expressing cells differentiated in vitro from ES cells and to assess their suitability for the treatment of diabetes. METHODS: ES cell-derived insulin-expressing cells were characterised by means of immunocytochemistry, RT-PCR and functional analyses. Activation of the Insulin I promoter during ES-cell differentiation was assessed in ES-cell lines transfected with a reporter gene. ES cell-derived cultures were transplanted into STZ-treated SCID-beige mice and blood glucose concentrations of diabetic mice were monitored for 3 weeks. RESULTS: Insulin-stained cells differentiated from ES cells were devoid of typical beta-cell granules, rarely showed immunoreactivity for C-peptide and were mostly apoptotic. The main producers of proinsulin/insulin in these cultures were neurons and neuronal precursors and a reporter gene under the control of the insulin I promoter was activated in cells with a neuronal phenotype. Insulin was released into the incubation medium but the secretion was not glucose-dependent. When the cultures were transplanted in diabetic mice they formed teratomas and did not reverse the hyperglycaemic state. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Our studies show that insulin-positive cells in vitro-differentiated from ES cells are not beta cells and suggest that alternative protocols, based on enrichment of ES cell-derived cultures with cells of the endodermal lineage, should be developed to generate true beta cells for the treatment of diabetes.
AIM/HYPOTHESIS: Embryonic stem (ES) cells have been proposed as a potential source of tissue for transplantation for the treatment of Type 1 diabetes. However, studies showing differentiation of beta cells from ES cells are controversial. The aim of this study was to characterise the insulin-expressing cells differentiated in vitro from ES cells and to assess their suitability for the treatment of diabetes. METHODS: ES cell-derived insulin-expressing cells were characterised by means of immunocytochemistry, RT-PCR and functional analyses. Activation of the Insulin I promoter during ES-cell differentiation was assessed in ES-cell lines transfected with a reporter gene. ES cell-derived cultures were transplanted into STZ-treated SCID-beige mice and blood glucose concentrations of diabeticmice were monitored for 3 weeks. RESULTS: Insulin-stained cells differentiated from ES cells were devoid of typical beta-cell granules, rarely showed immunoreactivity for C-peptide and were mostly apoptotic. The main producers of proinsulin/insulin in these cultures were neurons and neuronal precursors and a reporter gene under the control of the insulin I promoter was activated in cells with a neuronal phenotype. Insulin was released into the incubation medium but the secretion was not glucose-dependent. When the cultures were transplanted in diabeticmice they formed teratomas and did not reverse the hyperglycaemic state. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Our studies show that insulin-positive cells in vitro-differentiated from ES cells are not beta cells and suggest that alternative protocols, based on enrichment of ES cell-derived cultures with cells of the endodermal lineage, should be developed to generate true beta cells for the treatment of diabetes.
Authors: Rohan K Humphrey; Nathan Bucay; Gillian M Beattie; Ana Lopez; Conrad A Messam; Vincenzo Cirulli; Alberto Hayek Journal: Diabetes Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Tino Klein; Zhidong Ling; Harry Heimberg; Ole D Madsen; R Scott Heller; Palle Serup Journal: J Histochem Cytochem Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 2.479
Authors: Wieslawa M Milewski; Karla A Temple; Robin L Wesselschmidt; Manami Hara Journal: In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 2.416