Literature DB >> 32090037

One year results of presbyLASIK using hybrid bi-aspheric micro-monovision ablation profile in correction of presbyopia and myopic astigmatism.

Fang Liu1, Ting Zhang1, Quan Liu1.   

Abstract

AIM: To analyze one year clinical outcomes and subjective rating of hybrid bi-aspheric multifocal central presbyLASIK with micro-monovision for correction of presbyopia and myopic astigmatism.
METHODS: Seventy-four eyes of 37 patients consecutively treated with presbyLASIK were assessed. The mean age of the patients was 43.8±3.0y with a mean spherical equivalent refraction of -5.21±1.87 diopters (D) and mean astigmatism of -0.82±0.64 D. Visual acuity, manifest refraction, contrast sensitivity, aberrometry and patients' subjective rating were evaluated pre- and postoperatively.
RESULTS: At 1y postoperatively (68 eyes of 34 patients), the mean spherical equivalent (SE) refraction in distance eyes was 0.06±0.05 D, whereas the achieved SE in near eyes was -0.83±0.05 D. Ninety-nine percent of eyes were within ±0.50 D of target correction of SE. The binocular mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 0.00±0.18 logMAR (20/20). Sixty-four percent of patients achieved 0.0 logMAR (20/20) or better of UDVA and 0.1 logRAD or better of UNVA as well. There was a binocularly loss of one line CDVA after surgery for only one patient (3%, 1/34) and no patient lost 2 lines. The changes in binocular contrast sensitivity (CS) in all test conditions were not significant at any frequency after surgery. The changes of entire eye total higher order aberrations (tHOA) and spherical aberrations (SA) significantly higher in near eyes than in distance eyes. The overall satisfaction score for surgery was 93±8.
CONCLUSION: The hybrid bi-aspheric multifocal central presbyLASIK with micro-monovision appears to be an efficacious option for myopic presbyopes. One year postoperative outcomes in a relatively young presbyopia population indicate improvements in both far and near vision with high satisfaction. International Journal of Ophthalmology Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  monovison; myopia; presbyLASIK; presbyopia

Year:  2020        PMID: 32090037      PMCID: PMC7013778          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2020.02.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  18 in total

Review 1.  Standard graphs for reporting refractive surgery.

Authors:  G O Waring
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Expanding depth of focus by modifying higher-order aberrations induced by an adaptive optics visual simulator.

Authors:  Karolinne Maia Rocha; Laurent Vabre; Nicolas Chateau; Ronald R Krueger
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Three-month clinical outcomes with static and dynamic cyclotorsion correction using the SCHWIND AMARIS.

Authors:  Samuel Arba-Mosquera; Maria C Arbelaez
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Presbyopic LASIK using hybrid bi-aspheric micro-monovision ablation profile for presbyopic corneal treatments.

Authors:  Michiel H A Luger; Colm McAlinden; Philip J Buckhurst; James S Wolffsohn; Shwetabh Verma; Samuel Arba Mosquera
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 5.  Surgical correction of presbyopia.

Authors:  Richard S Davidson; Deepinder Dhaliwal; D Rex Hamilton; Mitchell Jackson; Larry Patterson; Karl Stonecipher; Sonia H Yoo; Rosa Braga-Mele; Kendall Donaldson
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Aspheric Micro-monovision LASIK in Correction of Presbyopia and Myopic Astigmatism: Early Clinical Outcomes in a Chinese Population.

Authors:  Ting Zhang; Yuan Sun; Shengbei Weng; Manli Liu; Yugui Zhou; Xiaonan Yang; Aleksandar Stojanovic; Quan Liu
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Supplementary effect of static cyclotorsion compensation with dynamic cyclotorsion compensation on the refractive and visual outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  Minoru Tomita; Miyuki Watabe; Satoshi Yukawa; Nobuo Nakamura; Tadayuki Nakamura; Thomas Magnago
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Surgical management of presbyopia.

Authors:  André Am Torricelli; Jackson B Junior; Marcony R Santhiago; Samir J Bechara
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-06

Review 9.  Corneal compensation of presbyopia: PresbyLASIK: an updated review.

Authors:  Veronica Vargas-Fragoso; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2017-04-13

Review 10.  Presbyopic correction on the cornea.

Authors:  Samuel Arba Mosquera; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2014-11-13
View more
  1 in total

1.  Multifocal Femto-PresbyLASIK in Pseudophakic Eyes.

Authors:  Bojan Pajic; Horace Massa; Philipp B Baenninger; Erika Eskina; Brigitte Pajic-Eggspuehler; Mirko Resan; Zeljka Cvejic
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 4.241

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.