Literature DB >> 14965081

Impact of managed care on the treatment, costs, and outcomes of fee-for-service Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction.

M Kate Bundorf1, Kevin A Schulman, Judith A Stafford, Darrell Gaskin, James G Jollis, José J Escarce.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of market-level managed care activity on the treatment, cost, and outcomes of care for Medicare fee-for-service acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
SETTING: Patients from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project (CCP), a sample of Medicare beneficiaries discharged from nonfederal acute-care hospitals with a primary discharge diagnosis of AMI from January 1994 to February 1996. STUDY
DESIGN: We estimated models of patient treatment, costs, and outcomes using ordinary least squares and logistic regression. The independent variables of primary interest were market-area managed care penetration and competition. The models included controls for patient, hospital, and other market area characteristics. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHODS: We merged the CCP data with Medicare claims and other data sources. The study sample included CCP patients aged 65 and older who were admitted during 1994 and 1995 with a confirmed AMI to a nonrural hospital. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Rates of revascularization and cardiac catheterization for Medicare fee-for-service patients with AMI are lower in high-HMO penetration markets than in low-penetration ones. Patients admitted in high-HMO-competition markets, in contrast, are more likely to receive cardiac catheterization for treatment of their AMI and had higher treatment costs than those admitted in low-competition markets.
CONCLUSIONS: The level of managed care activity in the health care market affects the process of care for Medicare fee-for-service AMI patients. Spillovers from managed care activity to patients with other types of insurance are more likely when managed care organizations have greater market power.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14965081      PMCID: PMC1360998          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00219.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  32 in total

1.  How does managed care do it?

Authors:  D M Cutler; M McClellan; J P Newhouse
Journal:  Rand J Econ       Date:  2000

Review 2.  Utilization management: issues, effects, and future prospects.

Authors:  Thomas M Wickizer; Daniel Lessler
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2001-10-25       Impact factor: 21.981

3.  Managed care and technology adoption in health care: evidence from magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  L C Baker
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Managed care, technology adoption, and health care: the adoption of neonatal intensive care.

Authors:  Laurence C Baker; Ciaran S Phibbs
Journal:  Rand J Econ       Date:  2002

5.  The effects of market structure and bargaining position on hospital prices.

Authors:  G A Melnick; J Zwanziger; A Bamezai; R Pattison
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Managed care, consolidation among health care providers, and health care: evidence from mammography.

Authors:  L C Baker; M L Brown
Journal:  Rand J Econ       Date:  1999

7.  HMO market penetration and hospital cost inflation in California.

Authors:  J C Robinson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-11-20       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Managed care, market power, and monopsony.

Authors:  M V Pauly
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  The impact of HMO penetration on the rate of hospital cost inflation, 1985-1993.

Authors:  D J Gaskin; J Hadley
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.730

10.  The relation between managed care market share and the treatment of elderly fee-for-service patients with myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Paul A Heidenreich; Mark McClellan; Craig Frances; Laurence C Baker
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  The challenge of studying the effects of managed care as managed care evolves.

Authors:  Alex D Federman; Albert L Siu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Managed care market share and primary treatment for cancer.

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Mary Beth Landrum; Ellen Meara; Patricia A Ganz; Edward Guadagnoli
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Competitive culture does not guarantee improved quality.

Authors:  Fahmy Hanna
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Managed care and gender disparities in problematic health care experiences.

Authors:  Shannon Mitchell; Mark Schlesinger
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Modeling the impact of Medicare Advantage payment cuts on ambulatory care sensitive and elective hospitalizations.

Authors:  Lauren Hersch Nicholas
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  The Effects of Medicare Advantage Contract Concentration on Patients' Nursing Home Outcomes.

Authors:  Momotazur Rahman; David J Meyers; Vincent Mor
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Managing care? Medicare managed care and patient use of cardiologists.

Authors:  Marco D Huesch
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Cost effectiveness and screening interval of lipid screening in Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors.

Authors:  Aileen B Chen; Rinaa S Punglia; Karen M Kuntz; Peter M Mauch; Andrea K Ng
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Determinants of hospital choice of rural hospital patients: the impact of networks, service scopes, and market competition.

Authors:  Chul-Young Roh; Keon-Hyung Lee; Myron D Fottler
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 10.  Overuse and systems of care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Salomeh Keyhani; Raphael Falk; Elizabeth A Howell; Tara Bishop; Deborah Korenstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.