Literature DB >> 10558503

Managed care, consolidation among health care providers, and health care: evidence from mammography.

L C Baker1, M L Brown.   

Abstract

We discuss the effects of managed care on the structure of the health care delivery system, focusing on managed-care-induced consolidation among health care providers. We empirically investigate the relationship between HMO market share and mammography providers. We find evidence of consolidation: increases in HMO activity are associated with reductions in the number of mammography providers and with increases in the number of services produced by remaining providers. We also find that increases in HMO market share are associated with reductions in costs for mammography and with increases in waiting times for appointments, but not with worse health outcomes.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10558503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rand J Econ        ISSN: 0741-6261


  15 in total

1.  Is managed care leading to consolidation in health-care markets?

Authors:  David Dranove; Carol J Simon; William D White
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The effect of area HMO market share on cancer screening.

Authors:  Laurence C Baker; Kathryn A Phillips; Jennifer S Haas; Su-Ying Liang; Dean Sonneborn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Revisiting the relationship between managed care and hospital consolidation.

Authors:  Robert J Town; Douglas Wholey; Roger Feldman; Lawton R Burns
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Managed care market share and primary treatment for cancer.

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Mary Beth Landrum; Ellen Meara; Patricia A Ganz; Edward Guadagnoli
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  The Effect of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Adoption on Facility-Level Breast Cancer Screening Volume.

Authors:  Christoph I Lee; Weiwei Zhu; Tracy L Onega; Jessica Germino; Ellen S O'Meara; Constance D Lehman; Louise M Henderson; Jennifer S Haas; Karla Kerlikowske; Brian L Sprague; Garth H Rauscher; Anna N A Tosteson; Jennifer Alford-Teaster; Karen J Wernli; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Was the drop in mammography rates in 2005 associated with the drop in hormone therapy use?

Authors:  Nancy Breen; Kathleen A Cronin; Jasmin A Tiro; Helen I Meissner; Timothy S McNeel; Susan A Sabatino; Florence K Tangka; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Academic health systems management: the rationale behind capitated contracts.

Authors:  P A Taheri; D A Butz; L J Greenfield
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Mammography facilities are accessible, so why is utilization so low?

Authors:  Lee R Mobley; Tzy-Mey May Kuo; Laurel J Clayton; W Douglas Evans
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Do health insurers possess monopsony power in the hospital services industry?

Authors:  Laurie J Bates; Rexford E Santerre
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2008-03

10.  Predictors of endoscopic colorectal cancer screening over time in 11 states.

Authors:  Lee Mobley; Tzy-Mey Kuo; Matthew Urato; John Boos; Nancy Lozano-Gracia; Luc Anselin
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.