Literature DB >> 14959799

Cross-modal and non-sensory influences on auditory streaming.

Robert P Carlyon1, Christopher J Plack, Deborah A Fantini, Rhodri Cusack.   

Abstract

Carlyon et al (2001 Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 115-127) have reported that the buildup of auditory streaming is reduced when attention is diverted to a competing auditory stimulus. Here, we demonstrate that a reduction in streaming can also be obtained by attention to a visual task or by the requirement to count backwards in threes. In all conditions participants heard a 13 s sequence of tones, and, during the first 10 s saw a sequence of visual stimuli containing three, four, or five targets. The tone sequence consisted of twenty repeating triplets in an ABA - ABA ... order, where A and B represent tones of two different frequencies. In each sequence, three, four, or five tones were amplitude modulated. During the first 10 s of the sequence, participants either counted the number of visual targets, counted the number of (modulated) auditory targets, or counted backwards in threes from a specified number. They then made an auditory-streaming judgment about the last 3 s of the tone sequence: whether one or two streams were heard. The results showed more streaming when participants counted the auditory targets (and hence were attending to the tones throughout) than in either the 'visual' or 'counting-backwards' conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14959799     DOI: 10.1068/p5035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  19 in total

1.  Effects of self-motion on auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Hirohito M Kondo; Daniel Pressnitzer; Iwaki Toshima; Makio Kashino
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Initial development of a spatially separated speech-in-noise and localization training program.

Authors:  Richard S Tyler; Shelley A Witt; Camille C Dunn; Wenjun Wang
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  The effect of visual cues on auditory stream segregation in musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Jeremy Marozeau; Hamish Innes-Brown; David B Grayden; Anthony N Burkitt; Peter J Blamey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it?

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 5.  Properties of auditory stream formation.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Hedwig E Gockel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Modulations of neural activity in auditory streaming caused by spectral and temporal alternation in subsequent stimuli: a magnetoencephalographic study.

Authors:  Ivan Chakalov; Rossitza Draganova; Andreas Wollbrink; Hubert Preissl; Christo Pantev
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 3.288

7.  The effect of visual cues on difficulty ratings for segregation of musical streams in listeners with impaired hearing.

Authors:  Hamish Innes-Brown; Jeremy Marozeau; Peter Blamey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Attention, awareness, and the perception of auditory scenes.

Authors:  Joel S Snyder; Melissa K Gregg; David M Weintraub; Claude Alain
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-02-07

9.  Effortful listening: the processing of degraded speech depends critically on attention.

Authors:  Conor J Wild; Afiqah Yusuf; Daryl E Wilson; Jonathan E Peelle; Matthew H Davis; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Resources required for processing ambiguous complex features in vision and audition are modality specific.

Authors:  Morgan D Barense; Jonathan Erez; Henry Ma; Rhodri Cusack
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.