Literature DB >> 24022792

Resources required for processing ambiguous complex features in vision and audition are modality specific.

Morgan D Barense, Jonathan Erez, Henry Ma, Rhodri Cusack.   

Abstract

Processing multiple complex features to create cohesive representations of objects is an essential aspect of both the visual and auditory systems. It is currently unclear whether these processes are entirely modality specific or whether there are amodal processes that contribute to complex object processing in both vision and audition. We investigated this using a dual-stream target detection task in which two concurrent streams of novel visual or auditory stimuli were presented. We manipulated the degree to which each stream taxed processing conjunctions of complex features. In two experiments, we found that concurrent visual tasks that both taxed conjunctive processing strongly interfered with each other but that concurrent auditory and visual tasks that both taxed conjunctive processing did not. These results suggest that resources for processing conjunctions of complex features within vision and audition are modality specific.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24022792     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-013-0207-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.526


  76 in total

1.  Spectro-temporal response field characterization with dynamic ripples in ferret primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  D A Depireux; J Z Simon; D J Klein; S A Shamma
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Perceptual asymmetries in audition.

Authors:  Rhodri Cusack; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The dog's meow: asymmetrical interaction in cross-modal object recognition.

Authors:  Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg; Leon Y Deouell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Speed of processing in the human visual system.

Authors:  S Thorpe; D Fize; C Marlot
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-06-06       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Cortical connections of the somatosensory fields of the lateral sulcus of macaques: evidence for a corticolimbic pathway for touch.

Authors:  D P Friedman; E A Murray; J B O'Neill; M Mishkin
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1986-10-15       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Divided attention: evidence for coactivation with redundant signals.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Perceptual deficits in amnesia: challenging the medial temporal lobe 'mnemonic' view.

Authors:  Andy C H Lee; Tim J Bussey; Elisabeth A Murray; Lisa M Saksida; Russell A Epstein; Narinder Kapur; John R Hodges; Kim S Graham
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Perirhinal cortex supports delay fear conditioning to rat ultrasonic social signals.

Authors:  Derick H Lindquist; Leonard E Jarrard; Thomas H Brown
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The human medial temporal lobe processes online representations of complex objects.

Authors:  Morgan D Barense; David Gaffan; Kim S Graham
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  It does not look odd to me: perceptual impairments and eye movements in amnesic patients with medial temporal lobe damage.

Authors:  Jonathan Erez; Andy C H Lee; Morgan D Barense
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.