Literature DB >> 1494512

What are the benefits of routine breast cancer follow-up?

S Morris1, A P Corder, I Taylor.   

Abstract

The value of follow-up after potentially curative treatment of breast cancer remains controversial. Recurrence-free women (n = 402) attending a breast clinic over a 3 month period were studied. The women attended 423 appointments, 412 of which were routine. Eleven were requested by the patient or general practitioner (interval appointments). All 11 interval and 19 of the routine appointments resulted in investigations for possible recurrence. Three (27%) interval appointments and four (1%) routine appointments resulted in the diagnosis of a recurrence (P < 10(-5). The attitudes of 285 patients to follow-up were investigated by questionnaire. Two hundred and twenty-three (78%) questionnaires were completed. Regular follow-up in the breast clinic was preferred to attendance only when symptomatic by 190 (85%) women and 169 (76%) preferred regular breast clinic visits to general practitioner follow-up. Most women (n = 174) (81%) said they felt reassured and less anxious having attended the breast clinic. Routine follow-up after potentially curative treatment of breast cancer is inefficient in the detection of recurrence. It is, however, highly rated for providing reassurance and reducing anxiety. Reassurance rather than detection of recurrence may be the most important function of the breast cancer follow-up clinic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1494512      PMCID: PMC2399479          DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.68.805.904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  6 in total

1.  Management of patients after mastectomy.

Authors:  P B Clark; D L Morris
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-06-27

2.  Effectiveness of routine and spontaneous follow-up visits for breast cancer.

Authors:  K Holli; M Hakama
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-02

3.  Influence of early diagnosis on prognosis of recurrent breast cancer.

Authors:  M Stierer; H R Rosen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Screening for recurrent breast cancer--its effectiveness and prognostic value.

Authors:  R Tomin; W L Donegan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Value of routine follow up of women treated for early carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  J A Dewar; G R Kerr
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-11-23

6.  After surgery for breast cancer: which mode of surveillance?

Authors:  J J Tate; P C Clifford; G T Royle; R B Buchanan; I Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 18.000

  6 in total
  12 in total

1.  Routine surgical follow up: do surgeons agree?

Authors:  A Waghorn; J Thompson; M McKee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-11-18

2.  Models of care for early-stage breast cancer in Canada.

Authors:  Y Madarnas; A A Joy; S Verma; S Sehdev; W Lam; L Sideris
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Comparison of breast cancer patient satisfaction with follow-up in primary care versus specialist care: results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  E Grunfeld; R Fitzpatrick; D Mant; P Yudkin; R Adewuyi-Dalton; J Stewart; D Cole; M Vessey
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  A pilot study exploring the effect of discharging cancer survivors from hospital follow-up on the workload of general practitioners.

Authors:  I Chait; R Glynne-Jones; S Thomas
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Breast cancer recurrence: follow up after treatment for primary breast cancer.

Authors:  N Hiramanek
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  [18F]FDG in recurrent breast cancer: diagnostic performances, clinical impact and relevance of induced changes in management.

Authors:  Dany Grahek; Françoise Montravers; Khaldoun Kerrou; Nicolas Aide; Jean-Pierre Lotz; Jean-Noël Talbot
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Patient's needs and preferences in routine follow-up after treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  G H de Bock; J Bonnema; R E Zwaan; C J H van de Velde; J Kievit; A M Stiggelbout
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-03-22       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 8.  Alternative methods of follow up in breast cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  D A Montgomery; K Krupa; T G Cooke
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Ambulatory Medical Assistance--After Cancer (AMA-AC): A model for an early trajectory survivorship survey of lymphoma patients treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Gisèle Compaci; Manuela Rueter; Sébastien Lamy; Lucie Oberic; Christian Recher; Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre; Guy Laurent; Fabien Despas
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Changing pattern of the detection of locoregional relapse in breast cancer: the Edinburgh experience.

Authors:  D A Montgomery; K Krupa; W J L Jack; G R Kerr; I H Kunkler; J Thomas; J M Dixon
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.