Literature DB >> 10756611

Comparison of breast cancer patient satisfaction with follow-up in primary care versus specialist care: results from a randomized controlled trial.

E Grunfeld1, R Fitzpatrick, D Mant, P Yudkin, R Adewuyi-Dalton, J Stewart, D Cole, M Vessey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Routine follow-up of breast cancer patients in specialist clinics is standard practice in most countries. Follow-up involves regularly scheduled breast cancer check-ups during the disease-free period. The aims of follow-up are to detect breast cancer recurrence and to provide psychosocial support to the patient; however, little is known about patients' views on breast cancer follow-up. AIM: To assess the effect on patient satisfaction of transferring primary responsibility for follow-up of women with breast cancer in remission from hospital outpatient clinics to general practice.
METHOD: Randomized controlled trial with 18 months' follow-up in which women received routine follow-up either in hospital outpatient clinics or from their own general practitioner. Two hundred and ninety-six women with breast cancer in remission receiving regular follow-up care at two district general hospitals in England were included in the study. Patient satisfaction was measured by means of a self-administered questionnaire supplied three times during the 18-month study period.
RESULTS: The general practice group selected responses indicating greater satisfaction than did the hospital group on virtually every question. Furthermore, in the general practice group there was a significant increase in satisfaction over baseline; a similar significant increase in satisfaction over baseline was not found in the hospital group.
CONCLUSION: Patients with breast cancer were more satisfied with follow-up in general practice than in hospital outpatient departments. When discussing follow-up with breast cancer patients, they should be provided with complete and accurate information about the goals, expectations, and limitations of the follow-up programme so that they can make an informed choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10756611      PMCID: PMC1313497     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  27 in total

1.  Willingness to follow breast cancer. Survey of family physicians.

Authors:  A Worster; M J Bass; M L Wood
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 2.  Patient evaluations of hospital care. A review of the literature.

Authors:  H R Rubin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Follow up of patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  L E Hughes; S P Courtney
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-04-27

4.  Methodology in behavioral and psychosocial cancer research. Patients' perceptions of care. Measurement of quality and satisfaction.

Authors:  M T Oberst
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Psychological outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early breast cancer outside a clinical trial.

Authors:  L J Fallowfield; A Hall; G P Maguire; M Baum
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-09-22

6.  Comparison of criteria derived by government and patients for evaluating general practitioner services.

Authors:  C H Smith; D Armstrong
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-08-19

7.  Cancer patient satisfaction with care.

Authors:  J H Wiggers; K O Donovan; S Redman; R W Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Development of a questionnaire to assess patients' satisfaction with consultations in general practice.

Authors:  R Baker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care.

Authors:  J E Ware; M K Snyder; W R Wright; A R Davies
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  1983

10.  Perceptions of follow-up care in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  H B Muss; G S Tell; L D Case; P Robertson; B M Atwell
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.339

View more
  71 in total

1.  General practitioners and cancer.

Authors:  N Summerton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-22

2.  Breast cancer survivors' perceptions of survivorship care options.

Authors:  Erica L Mayer; Adrienne B Gropper; Bridget A Neville; Ann H Partridge; Danielle B Cameron; Eric P Winer; Craig C Earle
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  The interface between primary and oncology specialty care: treatment through survivorship.

Authors:  Eva Grunfeld; Craig C Earle
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

4.  Views of family physicians about survivorship care plans to provide breast cancer follow-up care: exploration of results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M A O'Brien; E Grunfeld; J Sussman; G Porter; M Hammond Mobilio
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Cancer survivorship: a challenge for primary care physicians.

Authors:  Eva Grunfeld
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Poor access to care: rural health deprivation?

Authors:  A Gordon Baird; Nat Wright
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  The willingness of general practitioners to be involved in the follow-up of adult survivors of childhood cancer.

Authors:  Ria Blaauwbroek; Nynke Zwart; Martijn Bouma; Betty Meyboom-de Jong; Willem A Kamps; Aleida Postma
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 8.  What do consumers see as important in the continuity of their care?

Authors:  Megan Barnet; Tim Shaw
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Care for Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Su Min Jeong; Sang Min Park
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  Follow-up care delivery among colorectal cancer survivors most often seen by primary and subspecialty care physicians.

Authors:  David A Haggstrom; Neeraj K Arora; Paul Helft; Marla L Clayman; Ingrid Oakley-Girvan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.