Literature DB >> 14872085

New European guidelines for the use of stored human biological materials in biomedical research.

C Trouet1.   

Abstract

The increasing possibilities for using tissue for research and development in genetics and biotechnology have made stored human biological materials more important than ever. Using stored human biological materials raises many legal and ethical questions. On an international level however, the use of these materials has not been regulated in a detailed manner so far. The Council of Europe recently declassified the text of the proposal for an instrument on the use of archived human biological materials in biomedical research for public consultation. The purpose of this paper is to comment on this document regarding its primary goal, which is to protect the rights and fundamental freedoms of the individual whose biological materials could be included in a research project. The guidelines offer good basic protection for sources of identifiable human biological materials but, surprisingly, offer no protection to sources of anonymous or anonymised materials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Council of Europe

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14872085      PMCID: PMC1757121          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2003.003467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  2 in total

1.  Archived specimens: a platform for discussion.

Authors:  D C Wertz
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  1999

2.  Biosamples, genomics, and human rights: context and content of Iceland's Biobanks Act.

Authors:  D E Winickoff
Journal:  J Biolaw Bus       Date:  2001
  2 in total
  8 in total

1.  Consent and anonymization in research involving biobanks: differing terms and norms present serious barriers to an international framework.

Authors:  Bernice S Elger; Arthur L Caplan
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Generating a taxonomy of regulatory responses to emerging issues in biomedicine.

Authors:  Wendy Lipworth
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Does an appeal to the common good justify individual sacrifices for genomic research?

Authors:  Rogeer Hoedemaekers; Bert Gordijn; Martien Pijnenburg
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2006-10-17

4.  Banking together. A unified model of informed consent for biobanking.

Authors:  Elena Salvaterra; Lucilla Lecchi; Silvia Giovanelli; Barbara Butti; Maria Teresa Bardella; Pier Alberto Bertazzi; Silvano Bosari; Guido Coggi; Domenico A Coviello; Faustina Lalatta; Maurizio Moggio; Mario Nosotti; Alberto Zanella; Paolo Rebulla
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Towards a richer debate on tissue engineering: a consideration on the basis of NEST-ethics.

Authors:  A J M Oerlemans; M E C van Hoek; E van Leeuwen; S van der Burg; W J M Dekkers
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 6.  Collection and use of human materials during TB clinical research; a review of practices.

Authors:  Joseph Ochieng; Betty Kwagala; Nelson Sewankambo
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.834

7.  The ethics of unlinked anonymous testing of blood: views from in-depth interviews with key informants in four countries.

Authors:  Anthony S Kessel; Jessica Datta; Kaye Wellings; Sarah Perman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Screening for colorectal cancer with FOBT, virtual colonoscopy and optical colonoscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in the Florence district (SAVE study).

Authors:  Lapo Sali; Grazia Grazzini; Francesca Carozzi; Guido Castiglione; Massimo Falchini; Beatrice Mallardi; Paola Mantellini; Leonardo Ventura; Daniele Regge; Marco Zappa; Mario Mascalchi; Stefano Milani
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 2.279

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.