Literature DB >> 1483821

Validity and reliability of a questionnaire on fecundability.

G A Zielhuis1, M E Hulscher, E I Florack.   

Abstract

The validity of a short questionnaire on fertility problems was tested on a group of 151 moderately educated women who had participated in a prospective study on early pregnancy failure some years before. Part of this group was approached by a personal interview, another part by telephone interviews and a third part was sent a questionnaire by mail. Reliability was tested on another population of 89 women with at least one child. The questionnaire was presented to these women twice with an interval of 3-5 weeks. The validity study showed no systematic errors for either of the approaches. Random errors were fairly large except for the personal interviews. The reliability showed great stability for the telephone interviews as well as for the mailed questionnaire. It is concluded that the questionnaire performs reasonably well, but on some items the draft questionnaire should be rephrased. The choice of a specific approach to the study population depends on the research question.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Data Collection; Demographic Factors; Fecundability--women; Fecundity; Fertility--women; Interviews; Measurement; Population; Population Dynamics; Reliability; Reproduction; Research Methodology; Sampling Studies; Studies; Survey Methodology; Surveys; Validity

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1483821     DOI: 10.1093/ije/21.6.1151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  36 in total

1.  Solvent use and time to pregnancy among female personnel in biomedical laboratories in Sweden.

Authors:  H Wennborg; L Bodin; H Vainio; G Axelsson
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Time To Pregnancy and occupational lead exposure.

Authors:  M Joffe; L Bisanti; P Apostoli; P Kiss; A Dale; N Roeleveld; M-L Lindbohm; M Sallmén; M Vanhoorne; J P Bonde
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 3.  Is human fecundity changing? A discussion of research and data gaps precluding us from having an answer.

Authors:  Melissa M Smarr; Katherine J Sapra; Alison Gemmill; Linda G Kahn; Lauren A Wise; Courtney D Lynch; Pam Factor-Litvak; Sunni L Mumford; Niels E Skakkebaek; Rémy Slama; Danelle T Lobdell; Joseph B Stanford; Tina Kold Jensen; Elizabeth Heger Boyle; Michael L Eisenberg; Paul J Turek; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Marie E Thoma; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Clustering of retrospectively reported and prospectively observed time-to-pregnancy.

Authors:  Katherine J Sapra; Alexander C McLain; José M Maisog; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  Parental infertility, infertility treatment and hepatoblastoma: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Susan E Puumala; Julie A Ross; James H Feusner; Gail E Tomlinson; Marcio H Malogolowkin; Mark D Krailo; Logan G Spector
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Time to pregnancy and exposure to pesticides in Danish farmers. ASCLEPIOS Study Group.

Authors:  S B Larsen; M Joffe; J P Bonde
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Time-to-Pregnancy Associated With Couples' Use of Tobacco Products.

Authors:  Katherine J Sapra; Dana B Barr; José M Maisog; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  Validity of self-reported time to pregnancy.

Authors:  Maureen A Cooney; Germaine M Buck Louis; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Bridget M McGuiness; Courtney D Lynch
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  Time-to-pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes in a South African population.

Authors:  Braimoh Bello; Danuta Kielkowski; Dick Heederik; Kerry Wilson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Work schedule and physical factors in relation to fecundity in nurses.

Authors:  Audrey J Gaskins; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Christina C Lawson; Eva S Schernhammer; Stacey A Missmer; Jorge E Chavarro
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 4.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.