Literature DB >> 1479374

Acetabular micromotion as a measure of initial implant stability in primary hip arthroplasty. An in vitro comparison of different methods of initial acetabular component fixation.

P G Perona1, J Lawrence, W G Paprosky, A G Patwardhan, M Sartori.   

Abstract

Micromotion has been shown to affect bony ingrowth into cementless components. This study was designed both to quantitate initial micromotion at the prosthesis-periacetabular bony interface and to compare different methods of commonly employed acetabular component fixations, ie, a press-fit hemispherical titanium cup, a press-fit hemispherical titanium cup with one and two dome screws, a press-fit titanium hemispherical cup with three spikes, and a cemented chromium-cobalt cup. The press-fit component without screws demonstrated the greatest motion equaling 162 microns at the ilium, 97 microns at the publis, and 54 microns at the ischium. With one and two screws placed into the dome, the mean ileal displacement decreased by 28 microns (17%) and 36 microns (22%), respectively. Dome screw placement demonstrated a minimal effect at the pubis and ischium. Compared to the press-fit component without augmentation, the tri-spike motion was less at the pubis and ischium. The cemented prosthesis provided the least amount of motion in all three areas tested. This experiment demonstrates that the ilium provides the least amount of support to immediate acetabular fixation, while the pubis (anterior column) and ischium (posterior column) provide more stability. One dome screw does not affect the stability of a hemispherical prosthetic cup significantly. A two dome screw fixation provides an added method of support at the ilium, but fails to decrease motion at the pubis or ischium significantly. The tri-spike fixation does not restrict motion at the ilium to the extent as the dome screws, but its effect at the ischium and pubis is much more pronounced. The obvious difference between initial motion seen with cemented versus uncemented components may suggest that before surgery, patients may need a period of protected weight bearing until ingrowth has occurred.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1479374     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(06)80076-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  15 in total

1.  Effects of screw eccentricity on the initial stability of the acetabular cup.

Authors:  Jui-Ting Hsu; Chih-Han Chang; Kai-Nan An; Mark E Zobitz; Rapin Phimolsarnti; Ronald R Hugate; Kuo-An Lai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [Does osteoporosis lead to reduction the primary stability of cementless hip cups?].

Authors:  C von Schulze-Pellengahr; A Bürkner; T Lichtinger; W Teske; A Fottner; B Wegener; T Vogel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Validation of FE micromotions and strains around a press-fit cup: introducing a new micromotion measuring technique.

Authors:  S G Clarke; A T M Phillips; A M J Bull
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Protrusio After Medial Acetabular Wall Breach in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher T Martin; Anneliese D Heiner; Thomas E Baer; Andrew J Pugely; Nicolas O Noiseux
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

5.  Assessing the Acetabular Cup Implant Primary Stability by Impact Analyses: A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  Adrien Michel; Romain Bosc; Jean-Paul Meningaud; Philippe Hernigou; Guillaume Haiat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Ex Vivo Evaluation of Cementless Acetabular Cup Stability Using Impact Analyses with a Hammer Instrumented with Strain Sensors.

Authors:  Antoine Tijou; Giuseppe Rosi; Philippe Hernigou; Charles-Henri Flouzat-Lachaniette; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Early catastrophic failure of Birmingham acetabular dysplasia cup in revision arthroplasty: a case report.

Authors:  Manjunath Ramappa; Andrew Port
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2009-07-30

8.  A cementless, elastic press-fit socket with and without screws.

Authors:  Dean Pakvis; Joan Luites; Gijs van Hellemondt; Maarten Spruit
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 9.  Micromotions and combined damages at the dental implant/bone interface.

Authors:  Shan-Shan Gao; Ya-Rong Zhang; Zhuo-Li Zhu; Hai-Yang Yu
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 6.344

10.  Acetabular components with or without screws in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Murad Pepe; Onur Kocadal; Tamer Erener; Kubilay Ceritoglu; Ertugrul Aksahin; Cem Nuri Aktekin
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-09-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.