Literature DB >> 14769327

Multiservice laparoscopic surgical training using the daVinci surgical system.

Eric J Hanly1, Michael R Marohn, Sharon L Bachman, Mark A Talamini, Sander O Hacker, Robin S Howard, Noah S Schenkman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The daVinci surgical system affords surgeons a magnified three-dimensional videoscopic view of the operative field and precise articulating laparoscopic instruments. The learning curve for this advanced surgical robotics system is poorly characterized.
METHODS: Twenty-three surgeons representing seven surgical subspecialties participated in a surgical robotics training program consisting of standardized daVinci system training (phase 1) followed by self-guided learning in a porcine model (phase 2).
RESULTS: The average number of recorded procedures performed per surgeon during phase 2 was 5.5. The mean daVinci system set-up time was 45 minutes and decreased by an average of 56.1% by the third successive set-up (r = -0.702, P <0.005). Operative times decreased 39.0% by the third successive practice operation (r = -0.860, P <0.0005).
CONCLUSIONS: New use of the daVinci robot is associated with a rapid learning curve and preclinical animal model training is effective in developing surgical robotics skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14769327     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.11.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  17 in total

Review 1.  Dealing with robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: Current status and perspectives.

Authors:  Roberto Biffi; Fabrizio Luca; Paolo Pietro Bianchi; Sabina Cenciarelli; Wanda Petz; Igor Monsellato; Manuela Valvo; Maria Laura Cossu; Tiago Leal Ghezzi; Kassem Shmaissany
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Training and outcome monitoring in robotic urologic surgery.

Authors:  Daniel Liberman; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Claudio Jeldres; Luc Valiquette; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  A consensus document on robotic surgery.

Authors:  D M Herron; M Marohn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The effects of fasting and general anesthesia on serum chemistries in KCG miniature pigs.

Authors:  Hozumi Tanaka; Takashi Igarashi; Alan T Lefor; Eiji Kobayashi
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.232

5.  Validated robotic laparoscopic surgical training in a virtual-reality environment.

Authors:  Dimitrios Katsavelis; Ka-Chun Siu; Bernadette Brown-Clerk; Irene H Lee; Yong Kwon Lee; Dmitry Oleynikov; Nick Stergiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The multiphasic learning curve for robot-assisted rectal surgery.

Authors:  Kevin Kaity Sng; Masayasu Hara; Jae-Won Shin; Byung-Eun Yoo; Kyung-Sook Yang; Seon-Hahn Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Learning tools and simulation in robotic surgery: state of the art.

Authors:  Nicolas C Buchs; François Pugin; Francesco Volonté; Philippe Morel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Education and research using experimental pigs in a medical school.

Authors:  Hozumi Tanaka; Eiji Kobayashi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.731

9.  Design and evaluation of an interactive training system for scrub nurses.

Authors:  Bernhard Glaser; Tobias Schellenberg; Lucas Koch; Mathias Hofer; Susanne Modemann; Patrick Dubach; Thomas Neumuth
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  Retention of fundamental surgical skills learned in robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Irene H Suh; Mukul Mukherjee; Bhavin C Shah; Dmitry Oleynikov; Ka-Chun Siu
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.