Linda S Elting1, Ya-Chen Tina Shih. 1. Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA. lelting@mdanderson.org
Abstract
GOALS OF WORK: Economic and regulatory healthcare policy is limited by the lack of population-based information on the cost of supportive care of cancer patients. The goal of this study was to estimate these costs and to explore the impact of these costs on policy decisions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified estimates of the cost of outpatient and inpatient supportive care from published reports in the literature. The range of these costs (from lowest to highest) is described for each supportive care condition. These estimates were supplemented by computing the cost of all hospitalizations for these conditions in Texas between June 2000 and December 2001. Medicare payments were used to estimate average reimbursement. Costs (not charges) were standardized to 2002 US dollars using the consumer price index for medical care and Medicare's cost-to-charge ratio for Texas. MAIN RESULTS: Inpatient care for most conditions exceeded 7,000 US dollars per episode. Our population-based estimates of the cost of care were similar to literature-based estimates, except in the case where conditions could be managed in the outpatient setting. Average Medicare payments were often far lower than the estimated cost of care. For example, the estimated cost of hospitalization for management of diarrhea was 6,616 US dollars while the average Medicare payment was only 2,809 US dollars. CONCLUSIONS: Many supportive care interventions are quite expensive. In an environment focused on cost containment, a risk-based approach to expensive supportive care treatments is essential. Further study of the cost effectiveness of supportive care management strategies is indicated.
GOALS OF WORK: Economic and regulatory healthcare policy is limited by the lack of population-based information on the cost of supportive care of cancerpatients. The goal of this study was to estimate these costs and to explore the impact of these costs on policy decisions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified estimates of the cost of outpatient and inpatient supportive care from published reports in the literature. The range of these costs (from lowest to highest) is described for each supportive care condition. These estimates were supplemented by computing the cost of all hospitalizations for these conditions in Texas between June 2000 and December 2001. Medicare payments were used to estimate average reimbursement. Costs (not charges) were standardized to 2002 US dollars using the consumer price index for medical care and Medicare's cost-to-charge ratio for Texas. MAIN RESULTS: Inpatient care for most conditions exceeded 7,000 US dollars per episode. Our population-based estimates of the cost of care were similar to literature-based estimates, except in the case where conditions could be managed in the outpatient setting. Average Medicare payments were often far lower than the estimated cost of care. For example, the estimated cost of hospitalization for management of diarrhea was 6,616 US dollars while the average Medicare payment was only 2,809 US dollars. CONCLUSIONS: Many supportive care interventions are quite expensive. In an environment focused on cost containment, a risk-based approach to expensive supportive care treatments is essential. Further study of the cost effectiveness of supportive care management strategies is indicated.
Authors: K R Meehan; C O Matias; S S Rathore; S G Sandler; J Kallich; J LaBrecque; H Erder; K A Schulman Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 10.047
Authors: R A Zabinski; T A Burke; J Johnson; F Lavoie; C Fitzsimon; R Tretiak; J V Chancellor Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2001 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: Michael W Schuster; Tsiporah B Shore; John G Harpel; June Greenberg; Bita Jalilizeinali; Scott Possley; Robert W Gerwien; William Hahne; Yuan-Di C Halvorsen Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2007-08-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Alan Carlotto; Virginia L Hogsett; Elyse M Maiorini; Janet G Razulis; Stephen T Sonis Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: Claudia Canella; Michael Mikolasek; Matthias Rostock; Matthias Guckenberger; Josef Jenewein; Esther Linka; Claudia Six; Sarah Stoll; Roger Stupp; Claudia M Witt Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2020-05-24 Impact factor: 4.430