Literature DB >> 10388888

Management paradigms for posterior epistaxis: A comparison of costs and complications.

E D Monte1, M J Belmont, M K Wax.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Posterior epistaxis is a common otolaryngologic emergency. Management is controversial because of the many treatment options available. These options vary in efficacy, rates of complications, and cost. Posterior nasal packing is the medical management most frequently used to control posterior epistaxis. It is associated with major complications, including stroke, myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, and death. Because of these potential complications, many otolaryngologists monitor patients with posterior nasal packing in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, the level of care used to monitor these patients is variable, and standards have not been established.
METHODS: From 1991 to 1997, 46 patients had posterior nasal packing placed to control epistaxis. Management, complications, and hospital charges were analyzed.
RESULTS: Six patients (13%) were admitted to the ICU, 2 (4%) were admitted for telemetry monitoring, and 38 (83%) were sent to the ENT ward for continuous pulse oximetry. Four major complications occurred (1 episode of syncope [emergency department], 2 arrhythmias [ICU], and 1 death [hospice]). Twenty-six patients were treated with posterior packing in the ENT ward, at a mean cost of $2988. Fourteen patients underwent intervention (5 ligations, 6 endoscopic cauterizations, and 3 angiograms), with a mean cost of $5482. Six patients spent time in the ICU, with a mean cost of $8242. Patients treated in the ENT ward had significantly lower costs than those undergoing intervention (P = 0.017) or those admitted to the ICU (P = 0.020).
CONCLUSION: We propose that most patients with posterior epistaxis can be treated in specialized ENT wards. This can be done without increasing complications and with significantly decreased costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10388888     DOI: 10.1016/S0194-5998(99)70134-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  6 in total

1.  A study to determine the benefits of bilateral versus unilateral nasal packing with Rapid Rhino ® packs.

Authors:  Roland Hettige; Sam Mackeith; Adam Falzon; Mark Draper
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Emergency Otorhinolaryngolocal cases in Medical College, Kolkata-A statistical analysis.

Authors:  Somnath Saha; Sudipta Chandra; Prabir Kumar Mondal; Sudip Das; Saibal Mishra; M A Rashid; A R Mondal
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-07

3.  The economic burden of supportive care of cancer patients.

Authors:  Linda S Elting; Ya-Chen Tina Shih
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-02-07       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Radiological diagnosis and management of epistaxis.

Authors:  Antonín Krajina; Viktor Chrobok
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  The Endovascular Treatment of Epistaxis.

Authors:  S Nicolay; T Van Der Zijden; M Voormolen; O d'Archambeau; J Maes; F De Belder; P M Parizel
Journal:  J Belg Soc Radiol       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 1.894

6.  Clinical outcome of patients with epistaxis treated with nasal packing after hospital discharge.

Authors:  Marina Faistauer; Angela Faistauer; Rafaeli S Grossi; Renato Roithmann
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.