Literature DB >> 14766958

Allometry of kinematics and energetics in carpenter bees (Xylocopa varipuncta) hovering in variable-density gases.

Stephen P Roberts1, Jon F Harrison, Robert Dudley.   

Abstract

We assessed the energetic and aerodynamic limits of hovering flight in the carpenter bee Xylocopa varipuncta. Using normoxic, variable-density mixtures of O(2), N(2) and He, we were able to elicit maximal hovering performance and aerodynamic failure in the majority of bees sampled. Bees were not isometric regarding thorax mass and wing area, both of which were disproportionately lower in heavier individuals. The minimal gas density necessary for hovering (MGD) increased with body mass and decreased with relative thoracic muscle mass. Only the four bees in our sample with the highest body mass-specific thorax masses were able to hover in pure heliox. Wingbeat frequency and stroke amplitude during maximal hovering were significantly greater than in normodense hovering, increased significantly with body mass during normodense hovering but were mass independent during maximal hovering. Reserve capacity for wingbeat frequency and stroke amplitude decreased significantly with increasing body mass, although reserve capacity in stroke amplitude (10-30%) exceeded that of wingbeat frequency (0-8%). Stroke plane angle during normodense hovering was significantly greater than during maximal hovering, whereas body angle was significantly greater during maximal hovering than during normodense hovering. Power production during normodense hovering was significantly less than during maximal hovering. Metabolic rates were significantly greater during maximal hovering than during normodense hovering and were inversely related to body mass during maximal and normodense hovering. Metabolic reserve capacity averaged 34% and was independent of body mass. Muscle efficiencies were slightly higher during normodense hovering. The allometry of power production, power reserve capacity and muscle efficiency were dependent on the assumed coefficient of drag (C(D)), with significant allometries most often at lower values of C(D). Larger bees operate near the envelope of maximal performance even in normodense hovering due to smaller body mass-specific flight muscles and limited reserve capacities for kinematics and power production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14766958     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.00850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  11 in total

1.  Wingbeat kinematics and energetics during weightlifting in hovering hummingbirds across an elevational gradient.

Authors:  Derrick J E Groom; M Cecilia B Toledo; Kenneth C Welch
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Do insect metabolic rates at rest and during flight scale with body mass?

Authors:  Jeremy E Niven; Jörn P W Scharlemann
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Surpassing Mt. Everest: extreme flight performance of alpine bumble-bees.

Authors:  Michael E Dillon; Robert Dudley
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Short-amplitude high-frequency wing strokes determine the aerodynamics of honeybee flight.

Authors:  Douglas L Altshuler; William B Dickson; Jason T Vance; Stephen P Roberts; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The thermal performance curve for aerobic metabolism of a flying endotherm.

Authors:  Jordan R Glass; Jon F Harrison
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 5.530

6.  Lifetime- and caste-specific changes in flight metabolic rate and muscle biochemistry of honeybees, Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Schippers; Reuven Dukas; Grant B McClelland
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 2.200

7.  The effects of age and behavioral development on honey bee (Apis mellifera) flight performance.

Authors:  Jason T Vance; Jason B Williams; Michelle M Elekonich; Stephen P Roberts
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Social consequences of energetically costly nest construction in a facultatively social bee.

Authors:  Madeleine M Ostwald; Trevor P Fox; Jon F Harrison; Jennifer H Fewell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Food load manipulation ability shapes flight morphology in females of central-place foraging Hymenoptera.

Authors:  Carlo Polidori; Angelica Crottini; Lidia Della Venezia; Jesús Selfa; Nicola Saino; Diego Rubolini
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.172

10.  Rapid frequency modulation in a resonant system: aerial perturbation recovery in hawkmoths.

Authors:  Jeff Gau; Ryan Gemilere; Lds-Vip Fm Subteam; James Lynch; Nick Gravish; Simon Sponberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.